Subject: It's all Clinton's fault

 After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000;
 Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

 First, do you have ANY idea what facts are?
 Facts are things you can't find on FOX News or in Monkeyland.
 Second, I can tell you didn't write this - you copied and forwarded
 the same old crap that's been monkey-mailed around for over a year.
 The 1993 WTC bombers were tried and sent to prison.
 How can you have strong feelings on this subject and not know that?

 After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel.
 Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

 I'm not familiar (and you're not being specific) about that, but I'll bet
 the answer is the same as below.

 After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, (19 dead 200 military injured);
 Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

 Bush's best friends, the Saudis, beheaded the suspects before we could question them.
 How is that Clinton's fault?  Do you operate your entire life without having any facts?

 After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000;
 Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

 Clinton fired missles at bin Laden and Monkeyland said he was just trying to distract people
 from that idiotic partisan impeachment charade. The truth is, Clinton was doing his job while
 the GOP was ordering the FBI to look into his "girlfriends" when they should've been reading
 reports from the field that Middle Eastern types were attending flight schools.
 At one point, they had 700 FBI agents chasing tail in Arkansas.
 Those agents could've been protecting America, but the GOP wasd calling the shots.

 After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors;
 Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

 Clinton shouldn't have to babysit a US warship. If you were fair, you'd blame the ship's
 commanders for not paying enough attention to security while in very hostile waters.

 Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, 9-11 wouldn't have happened.

 But wait, 9-11 happened on Bush's watch.  Funny how you're willing to give him a
 complete pass, even tho he spent the entire month of August on vacation while the
 CIA and FBI  were buzzing about all the terrorist chatter leading up to 9-11.

 Bush went to Ground Zero and promised to bring those responsible to justice.
 Why hasn't Bush, with the best reason in history to get revenge, caught Osama?
 Where is bin Laden? You give Bush another pass for that?
 Bush went after Saddam, who clearly wasn't involved.
 The last two weeks, Bush has insisted getting Saddam isn't important.
 You giving him another pass for that?

 Another thing, and this cuts right to the heart - if Clinton is guilty of inaction,
 please list for me the positive steps Bush took to stop terrorism between Jan 20, 2001
 and September 11, 2001.

 The truth (if that means anything to you) is that he did nothing.  Blaming Clinton for not
 having done his job, how can you give Bush another pass for not acting after the fact?
 The Bush team didn't think Clinton did nothing, because if they did, they would have
 gone after bin Laden before 9-11 - how can you ignore those facts?

 Also, right after 9-11, Bush promised to track down the anthrax killer, the guy who
 was sending anthrax to Democrats only. You give him another pass for that?

 You are clearly bending over backwards to blame an innocent man while bending over
 backwards the other way to give Bush another pass, even tho it looks like Bush was
 involved in 9-11 because he's using all his power to prevent congress from looking into
 what he knew and when. Why would an innocent man blokc that investigation?

 You don't want the facts - you want to pretend.
 Go turn on FOX News and get some more "facts."

  back to

Privacy Policy
. .