From: ceetee99@hotmail.com
Today Rush said "too bad you can't identify
journalists in the womb,
you could slip a RU486 into the mothers
drink..."
Is this a startling new development in
the evolving of Rush Limbaugh?
Has Rush suddenly become pro-choice
or has he further slipped into
the deep abyss of being a nasty rotten
hateful piece of rat shit?
Ceetee
Now, now...
It's not polite to make fun of a stroke victim...
BTW, that KRMG thing below?
I called them and told them how stupid it was for them to say,
"There was no clear debate winner, but
4 out of 5 experts say Gore won,"
so now they've changed the text on their updates.
BartCop - Changing America for the better.
Can anybody tell me why USA Today stopped doing daily pollution
updates?
Is it because I was calling too much attention to Houston?
Why does USA Today want Smirk elected?
From: riskyschemer@hotmail.com
WHY hasn't Hillary Clinton been taken to
task for refusing to appear on those
Sunday talk shows? The Media Research Center's
Tim Graham has compiled some
pretty amazing statistics: Since April
1999, when the Clinton for Senator talk began
picking up steam, she has not appeared
on a single one of those network shows -
where public officials are routinely grilled
by the likes of Tim Russert and Sam Donaldson.
In contrast, Rick Lazio has appeared on
the Sunday shows eight times in that period -
most recently this past Sunday. The only
one who seems to have raised the issue is
CNN's Wolf Blitzer, who asked top Clinton
strategist Harold Ickes about it last May.
His response: She's been too busy focusing
on New York. Not that Mrs. Clinton hasn't
been given a network forum: CBS, CNN and
NBC all gave her town-hall meeting forums
- a far-less-risky forum at which the questioning
was mild and unchallenging.
How many town-hall meetings did the same
networks offer to Rick Lazio?
You guessed it - zero.
Riskyboy,
Hillary wants to talk about the issues that concern her constituents.
I can't speak for her, but I'm betting she'd agree to talk to
Jim Lehrer,
who, to my knowledge, hasn't been clawing for Clinton's cock
for 3 years.
Russert and Donaldson are only interested in Clinton's
cock, especially Russert.
Clinton's cock, Clinton's cock, Clinton's cock,
Clinton's cock, Clinton's cock, Clinton's cock,
Clinton's cock, Clinton's cock, Clinton's cock,
Clinton's cock, Clinton's cock, Clinton's cock,
You see?
That's all he thinks about.
He has Clinton's cock-on-the-brain.
He's addicted to Clinton's cock.
Why do you want to see Hillary involved in a pornographic production?
Do you desire Hillary sexually?
Does that kind of talk turn you on?
Where are your hands right now?
Great Republican Quotes
"The Republicans sent a boy to do a man's
job."
-- Pat Buchanon after the debates, on Fox News
Ratings up 10 percent for Monday Night Football
Thank you, Dennis Miller, for making even the bad games fun.
Maja-Piggie just said he was "flooded"
with e-mail last night that said,
"Our man Bush is getting his ass kicked
- hard!" and,
"Gore is walking away with this debate,
and the election!"
ha ha
Rush says he's, "sick and tired" of everybody
expecting to lose.
Hey, Pigboy!
Maybe that means they finally figured out
you're lying?
After eight years and three elections,
they understand?
ha ha
Your bovinity is inescapable, Rush.
I see in the USA
Today that Sheryl Crow, Mellissa
Ethridge, Heart, Amy Grant
and others are taping a show for a fund-raiser
to raise money for breast cancer research.
The program will air in the Lifetime Network
October 22.
Why isn't Rush ridiculing them?
Why isn't he making fun of cancer victims?
Where's his baby voice, whining about "liberals
and their feel good crap?"
Why isn't he picking on these women for
trying to help?
Maybe his USA Today didn't show up today...
Even MORE Trouble for Laura
Dr. Laura has wrong prescription for Canadian TV
TORONTO, Oct 3 (Reuters) - Two Canadian
television stations appear poised to drop
``Dr. Laura,'' the U.S. daytime programme
hosted by the screeching Laura Schlessinger,
because of poor ratings and lack of advertising.
``We don't have anything confirmed at this point
but there will be confirmation tomorrow,''
said Lori Rosenberg, programming director
at ONtv, but declined to go into specifics
ahead of the official announcement.
The show, which premiered September 11, has been dogged by low ratings and poor reviews.
The Canadian Broadcasting Standards Council
condemned Laura for referring to gays as
``abnormal,'' aberrant,`` deviant,'' ``disordered''
and ``dysfunctional'' on her radio show.
The Council branded her comments about
homosexuality as ``abusively discriminatory''
and ``in breach of'' Canada's broadcasting
code.
(Ediotr's Note: Not to mention good taste.)
We haven't mentioned Patrick Farley's great work in a while.
Everyone should see this at least twice.
A list of questions to ask Smirk in next week's debate
1. As President making $400,000
a year, how much more -- in dollars --
will you get back
under your tax plan over the four years of your term?
2. How much -- in dollars -- will your secretary get back during the same four years?
After which State is the USS MISSOURI named?
ha ha
More Trouble for Laura
The
Ailing ‘Dr. Laura’
Stations
can’t sell her talk show. Is gay protest working?
Dr.
Laura’s ongoing problem with gay-rights activists is prompting
at
least a handful of station executives to pop a few aspirin.
"We
had seven or eight advertisers last week alone saying they don’t
want to advertise on the show. So, does that have an impact? Yes
it does,"
says
Mary MacMillan, general manager of WBTV(TV) Charlotte, N.C.
Says
KYW-TV Philadelphia spokeswoman Joanne Calabria:
"At
this point, it’s been very difficult to get anyone to advertise on the
show.
We’ve
even had [nonprofit] PSA people call us and ask
‘will
you please not put our PSAs on her show?'"
Poor Laura the Ho - she can't give it away.
K-Drag Nazi radio, KRMG,
opens every bi-hourly newscast with,
"Last night's debate showed no
clear winner.
A panel of five debate experts scored
the debate 4-1 for Al Gore."
Excuse me, but 4-out-of-5 seems pretty clear to me.
Pigboy just had "Chris the Screamer" on his show.
Pigboy couldn't get a word in.
Matthews wouldn't let him.
More Reaction
From: turtopia@texas.net
I watched with the full expectation
of W. coming off like an idiot
....much to my surprise,he did not.
I expected a more fluid Gore
...we got it in snippets, when he was
passionate about something, it showed
...otherwise he was still pretty stiff.
But hey,that's his personality and people
are what they are after all,right?
I have to say up front that I don't like
either one very much.
..and my take on this debate was the
two of them politely calling each other a liar.
The obvious gaffe for W. was the tossed
in comment about the temple thing.
...uncalled for and out of sync. Plus
his outright lie about education in Texas...
Bush clearly is lacking in education
here in Texas no matter what smoke he blows.
My initial impression? They are both
manipulating the truth.I need to see more
before I decide...the Clinton administrations
success is undeniable, but the people
truely responsible for our prosperity
remains in question.
Maybe it was US doing these good
things in spite of them
........on the fence man....on the fence.
R. The Reptile House
http://skinkboy59.tripod.com
R, thanks for reminding me about that.
Last night, Gore used a line I've been
using for years.
When Smirk said the credit for the economy
goes to the hard-working people,
Gore reminded him,"People worked hard for
Reagan-Butch, too,
but trickle-down strangled everbody but
the super-rich."
From: LadyLiberal@webtv.net
Right now I`m lighting a candle and
having a moment of silence
for the late and unlamented gw.bush
campaign.
Man,I wish I could play taps.
LOL
From: barnekow@postnet.com
Did you notice how, during the debate
tonight, whenever Gore was
speaking and tearing into Smirk,
Smirk would sniff his nose loudly?
Is this a habit from his coke days?
Does he crave some blow to keep him
calm?
At first it just irritated me, but, on further review, it alarmed me!
Chris
From:guydubet@tomatoweb.com
Shit for brains talking about Gore's
"lack of character".
Who is the moderator who kept dragging
out the Buddist temple bullshit?
I can't believe we are letting SHIT
FOR BRAINS get away with "character" issues.
Gore should bitch slap that fucking
jerkoff.
BC, do you think that Gore will be President
November 7?
Bush has gotten a free pass by the press
and it looks like
NOTHING IN SHIT FOR BRAINS BACKROUND
WILL BE EXPOSED BEFORE NOVEMBER 7
Ediotr's Note:Gore
can't lose, no matter what.
From: jstone@sofnet.com
Am I wrong?
Or did Algore kill him right from the
start?
... noone was expecting much from Dubya"
...
Tell Mrs. BC to kiss her Jag goodby ...
From: stewarca@muohio.edu
Q: What's 2 + 2? Mr. Vice President?
A: Jim, the answer is four.
Q: Gov. Bush?
A: Fuzzy, Washington, liberal-activist
math. (pause) Wait, no, it IS four.
From: wildcat@hit.net
Man, Dubya's cheap shots are falling *flat*,
and Gore's cheap shots
-- Hey!
Where are Gore's cheap shots?
From: cealie@uswest.net
It was obvious to me throughout the
debate that Dubya was a sniveling twit,
yet Dan Rather and some other nitwit
commented that Bush "gained a lot"
from the debate. They said there
was no clear winner.
Now I'm hearing Satan himself, Cheney,
saying that Gore ignored the questions,
yet it was the idiot Smirk who had to
ask to have a question repeated.
How can a liberal media myth be perpetuated
while this is going on?
They gave Dubya points just for showing
up!!
Gore washed the floor with him on Kosovo,
on Social Security & Medicare
and he looked confident and presidential.
He made it clear to me that in a crisis
or unexpected financial downturn, HE
would have a grasp on what was going on
and he'd know what to do. Bush
did a lot of flubbing on information gathering,
finding out all the facts and general
jerking off without making a decision.
And at the end, there we was stumbling
all over his words, begging for my vote.
He KNEW he took it in the ass.
It was in his voice, you could hear it.
The CBS internet poll off the internet
said 49% Gore won the debate,
34% Bush won. 19% worse opinion of Bush
now.
Dubya looked and sounded like he was
losing his train of thought.
Why don't they call it like they see
it?
Cealie
Cealie,
It's not the media's job to be fair or
accurate.
It's their job to pretend it's a race,
so tune in tomorrow
and they'll tell us again just how close
it is.
...and now, a word from Damp-Rid.
From:jcaicedo@lycos.com
Hey BC, caught the debate.
Gore is history, get ready for 4 (8?) years
of Republican rule.
Looks like George isn't the pushover people
thought he was going to be.
If this debate is any indication of what's
to come, it'll be an added
insult to injury and Gore is going to need
a shitload of recovery time.
As far as uneducated, yeah you are.
Apparently your grammar is quite poor.
Apparently an UNEDUCATED person such as
yourself can't even spell the word.
Your admirers are no better either, I kind
of see it as the blind leading the blind.
Ha! Ha!
Anyway, I have to go but I figured that you needed a reality check.
P.S. I don't listen to Rush, so my
opinions are my own and for
crying out loud, quit hating yourself because
you're white.
Take care..........
Jorge Gaicedo
Pigboy thinks Smirk lost
Instead of gloating, he's whining about, "It wasn't fair!"
He's VERY pissed off about last night.
He knows Smirk is roadkill.
He knows it's all over.
Three elections in a row.
El Castrado will help Gore win this year, like he helped
in '92 and '96.
As I type this, Pigboy is SCREAMING!
ha ha
He has Smirk-for-brains today.
"Don't be so depressed," he's whaling!
"Don't get sucked in!"
ha ha
"Ignore all the polls that say Gore won!"
"Trust my instincts"
ha ha
This is the best Pigboy's been in a while.
More Reaction
From: vance_everson@yahoo.com
i was a little disappointed by Al tonite,
although i wasn't impressed at all by the smirk.
Al was a little too repetetive about
some issues...i realize some things need to be
hammered home, but there is a
limit.
Dumbya seemed tentative and unsure to
me, when he wasn't sounding scripted.
And all of his obviously pre-written
sound-bite 'punchlines' were delivered very badly.
Unfortunately, a lot of the "common
man" responses i'm hearing on various outlets
seem to think smirk did a good job -that
makes me nervous.
From: cdotto@execpc.com
I can't wait 'til next week's debate.
It was obvious from tonight's performance
that Bush can't think on his feet.
He's reaaaalllly gonna suck with next
week's conversational format.
Good point.
Smirk's already shot his, "Buddhist Temple" and "Invented the
Internet" wads.
From: lind2116@home.com
CNN pundits immediately labeled Smirk
as "holding his own."
Sure, he was holding it from peeing
on the floor. The guy is a jerk!
VP Gore gave it to him good when he
told him it was not in the USA's interest
to allow Russia to supervise Molosovic.
VP Gore kept laughing at Smirk's stupidity.
Great cartoon opportunity for K.Cunningham.Smirk
delivered flawlessly at the end,
afterall, it's a script he's been memorizing
since last May.
What a jerk!
Grandma, New Jersey
From: lisieux@worldnet.att.net
Did you hear 'em Bart.?..the two LWA's
(Lard-Asses With Attitudes)
Jackie Judd and Candy Crowley...George
Staph Infection,
Tim "Shit for Brains" Russert, Jeff
"nitwit" Greenfield
...all spinning for Smirka-bob...all
trying to tell us
that the Texas Twit didn't just melt
behind that podium.
"We will fight war so that we will never have
to fight wars."
Did the Texas Chicken Hawk really say
that or were my ears deceiving me?
Did he really say Gore is outspending
him in this election (what the hell did
he do with the 100 million his backers
raised for him?)
When he started with campaign finance
reform, Gore shoulda gone over
to the podium and pulled down Smirkie's
trousers and showed the whole world
where Big Pharma, the HMOs and the Oil
Barons tattooed his sorry ass.
ha ha
CNN Flash Poll Puts Gore As Winner of Debate
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A flash CNN/Gallup/USA Today poll taken
within
an hour after the finish of the first campaign 2000 presidential
debate favored Gore
as the winner by 48 percent to 41 percent over
the hapless Texas Smirk.
ha ha
That's a biased poll.
No way Smirk was only a nine-point loser.
From: Rmchadburn@aol.com
THIS IS MY FIRST TIME TO YOUR WEB PAGE,
AND YOU SAY THAT RUSH IS UNEDUCATED,
LOOK IN THE MIRROR.
ANYBODY CAN STAND BACK AND TALK TRASH,
BUT ITS THOSE WHO MAKE SENSE THAT ARE
THE
ONE'S THAT HAVE THE BRIAN'S.
NICE TRY, BUT I WOULD NOT QUIT MY DAY JOB!!
Who looked more presidential last night?
...
Some people say, "Smirk!"
The only reason for any TV, newspaper or Internet pundit to say,
"Smirk held his own," would be because if they told the truth,
if they said,
"This race was decided the second Smirk said he wanted to turn our
foreign policy
over to the Russians," there'd be no reason to watch network
news, the cable shows,
or read TIME or Newsweek or listen to the vulgar Pigboy.
It's crazy-talk when people say,
"I'll leave this country if so-and-so is elected president."
But it might make sense to say,
"I'm afraid to live in a country full of people so blind and
stupid
that they think that idiot Smirk won that debate last night."
I wouldn't mind if people said, "Gore was mean and condescending
last night,
and we should teach him a lesson and vote for that ignorant Bush
boy,"
but that's not what they're saying. They're saying wild shit
like,
"I thought Bush looked calm and confident,
and showed a lot of poise
and a lot better grasp of the issues
than Vice-President Gore."
That shit scares me to death.
CNN has the whole transcript, so you can check me out on this,
but when
Lehrer (who did a fine job, I thought. He's nobody's ditto-monkey)
said,
"Gov Bush, if a big catastrophe hit and there was a big emergency,
what's the first thing you would do?" and Smirk said,
"Can you repeat the question?"
Then he said, "I'd hug the man and cry with him."
Gee, Smirk, what about a prayer, too?
I mean, if a tornado just killed his kids and stole his house
and car,
don't you think he needs a hug AND a prayer?
And on top of everything else, Smirk said he'd look to the federal
government
for some teat milk, after campaigning on "Leave the states alone!"
Memo to VP Gore:
Al, in the next debate, when Smirk starts spouting, "I'll work
with Democrats,"
I'd like to see you respond with this:
"Governor, those stunts you pulled on John McCain were the
most unfair,
uncalled-for personal attacks I've seen in my 24 years in
politics.
Standing of a stage while your stooges said McCain turned
his back on the
Vietnam POW's, and calling McCain "pro-breast cancer," when
you knew
his sister was a victim of it shows us you can't even work
with Republicans,
so why the fuck should we believe your claim that you'll somehow
change
once we entrust you with the great power of the presidency,
you lying shit?"
No charge, Al.
That's a freebie.
Last night, after the debate, I was too shocked to type.
Focus dork after focus dork stood up and said, "Bush was in command,"
which was just too crazy to understand. My best guess is these
were
ditto-monkeys who told CNN and ABC that they were middle-roaders.
Your Comments:
From: rcox@m-y.net
Is it just me or does Smirk look like
Tommy Smothers when he smiles?
From: smacco@earthlink.net
It was a tie? Why was it a tie?
Because Bush didn't mispronounce any words?
It's a tie because the bar for Bush
is so low?
Roger Ebert:
I think Bush had a pretty embarrassing
response when he was asked about Milosevic,
calling on Russia to intervene when
he clearly didn't know that Russia does not support
our position. And there were times when
you didn't know if Bush could go the whole
two minutes. For instance, in the question
of how he would handle a crisis situation
-- I wasn't reassured that Bush flew
off to floods and fires in Texas. Every governor
flies off to floods and fires. But that's
not what that question was about.
Gore's response about the conflict in
Kosovo I felt was more germane.
Andrew Sullivan, victim of
Volume
74
The best way I can think to describe
the last hour and a half is "assisted suicide."
Gore was wooden, condescending, boring,
preachy, very liberal.
Bush was a human being, good-natured,
reasonable, smart, sane.
It was a knockout.
ha ha
Andrew, you haven't gotten any smarter since Volume 74, have you?
Luci the Bat
Well, I'm not thrilled. I finally was
reduced to thinking,
"If I had to be in traction for six
months, who do I want in the next bed?"
Under those circumstances, Bush won.
ha ha
...and since we're NOT under those circumstances???
I agree with The Bat.
When I had my two broken femurs, I was in traction for more than
six months.
Gore would've bored me to death as a roommate, but sarcasm and
ridicule can make
time fly, so yes, I'd rather have Smirk the Hitcher in
the traction ward with me.
Thanks for the insight, Luci!
David Horowitz, of slaphillary.com
Who won the debate? Bush had to defeat
the expectations that he was a
lightweight. He did. He
showed intelligence and comported himself with dignity.
Watch the gender gap close.
Yeah, all the women who want Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond and Jim
Inhofe
to make their personal reproductive decisions for them should
vote Smirk.
The Unknown Pundit:
Overall: Gore needs to watch a little
of his smugness, which put me off a little,
and go on the offensive more. On the
other hand, he put up a *very* strong
defense and dared the Master of Mr.
Dick to fight back, which he didn't.
From: skisics@yahoo.com
I wanted to let you know that I didn't
watch the debates last night.
My wife hates politics and after twenty
seconds said it was boring.
We ended up watching a cheesy, 1970's
jet disaster movie.
Kinda reminded me of Dubya's campaign
so far.
From: booradley@postmark.net
Why does the Today show insist on using
Tim-The-Whore for their post
debate commentary? He said "last
night was pretty much a draw" and
"there was no real winner". From
where I sat, Al Gore ran circles around Duh-bya.
"Gore deflected bush, as best he could"
and they're bringing up the "Gore Sighs"
But, they completely neglect the snorts
of derision (or coke?) from Bush's podium.
Every time Gore made a point, Bush snorted.
ha ha
That's true as hell. He kept snorting.
Perhaps he did a line before going onstage, "just to clear his
head?"
Dick Morris:
A BIG WIN FOR GORE
ANYONE who wondered why George W. Bush
worked overtime to avoid a nationally
televised debate that we would all watch
saw why last night. It wasn't even close - Al Gore
walked away with the debate. Gore
stayed on offense all night. Bush was off balance.
Gore scored early with his point about
tax cuts to the wealthy. He had the superior plan for
prescription drugs. He won the exchange
over abortion. He let Bush paint himself into a
corner over the energy/environmental
tradeoff. Bush had difficulty getting out of the box.
Bush let Gore speak for 60 percent of
the time. He fumbled around for words.
He groped for facts. He seemed frustrated
and flustered. Maybe next time, Bush will have
learned how to debate and will look
like he belonged in the same ring with Gore.
Last night, he didn't.
Neither man was Bill Clinton: Gore was
boring; Bush was scattered.
But when the debate turned to what crises
each man had handled and Gore spoke of war
and peace while Bush focused on floods
and fires, Gore's mastery was complete.
Gore seemed better prepared.
He looked more presidential.
In a word, Gore won big.
Koresh, we're all in trouble when we agree with Dick Morris.
Oh! Mr. Greenfield!!!
I think Bush surprised a lot of people
who thought he couldn't complete a sentence.
From: dr.bomb@usa.net
The Dubya Shrub is a blinking machine.
It may be him trying to suppress his
smirk or the need for him to lie.
Gore's eyes were more wide open than
the Dubya Shrub's eyes.
Gore is a statute when compared to Dubya
Shrub.
I heard somewhere that someone is about
to cave in when they blinked first.
It's the eyes.
The stigmata in this case is that the
Dubya Shrub has run out of lies.
It's the look in his eyes. The betrayal.
The need not to betray yet the betrayal
is right there in the look of his eyes.
From: seanog@metconnect.com
I am disappointed that, at 3:45AM EST,
you still haven't updated your site -
didn't Al Gore kick ass tonight? Yes,
he did! Did you fall asleep during the debate?
I was hoping
for your promised blow-by-blow commentary,
here I am,
4+ hours later, and you haven't updated
your site since early this evening.
Disappointing.
I will contact my doctor - again - and have my brain tumor checked.
From: Daennara@aol.com
Smirk remained vague, avoided Gore's
remarks about his tax cut proposal
like the plague, and couldn't stop snorting
for more than a minute at a time.
I mean, it was disgusting, smirk snorting
and contorting his face.
Why did the press notice Al's terrible
make-up job, but didn't see smirk's snort?
I'm even surprised that people actually
found this snorting and contorting, lip sucking,
face twisting, smirking candidate.......a
regular guy.
Smirk still comes across as a clueless
idiot
From: henryporter@bigfoot.com
Smirk: People need to be held
responsible for the action they take.....
What about actions like going AWOL?
Should people be held responsible if
they take that action?
What about snorting coke in direct violation
of the laws of your state?
Should someone be held responsible for
that?
How about cheating the people of Arlington,
TX in a land swindle in order
to make an obscene profit from corporate
fat-cats without doing any work?
From: johncross@prodigy.net
It is clear that Bush won the first
presidential debate.
First, he managed to say "hostage" instead
of "hostile".
Second, he stayed awake for a whole
90 minutes and didn't drool once
(although he did seem a bit groggy after
about 40 minutes).
Third, he made the hard choice of delegating
our foreign policy in
Eastern Europe to the Russians, even
though they seem to have very
different interests from ours in the
area.
Don't you just love this era of "lower
expectations" for our highest public officials?
If Bush gets to be president, it can
truly be said that ANYONE could be president
even if they can't find oil in Texas
and couldn't tell a Grecian from a petroleum distillate.
ha ha
From: craigatl@hotmail.com
The key to the debate will be Rush's
take on it tomorrow - after the Hillary debate,
he was bullish of course on Ricky...
"THAT'S what the republicans should
do .. be AGGRESSIVE."
Ricky's poll numbers sank like a rock
cause he was so obnoxious.
So if Rush is all over the airwaves,
saying Smirk won it hands down,
then Gore is in by a landslide.
GO BRAVES....
From: sabutai@ix.netcom.com
Did Gore really outspend Bush?
Here are some figures from the spread
sheet at opensecrets.org.
They get their information from the
Federal Election Commission:
Raised
Spent
Cash on Hand.
Smirk $177,124,847
$121,482,519
$55,642,328
Gore $126,646,594
$ 60,883,864
$65,762,831
___________ ___________
__________
-$ 50,478,259 -$ 60,598,655
+$10,120,503
Birthdays
Charlton Heston's cold, dead hands turn 76 today.
I wonder if he'll shoot anything besides his guns?
Rachel Lee Cook turns 21 today.
Rachel, go to Las Vegas.
Try the tequila bars.
Conservative Legal Foundation
Chief Charged with Indecency
Ditto-Monkey gets confused, grabs his
own cock
ATLANTA, Georgia (AP) -- The leader of a conservative legal foundation
seeking to have President Clinton disbarred was charged with
public indecency.
An undercover federal officer said he saw Matthew J. Glavin fondling
himself
on May 17 on a trail in the Chattahoochee River Park near Atlanta.
The officer said Glavin also fondled him after the two started
talking.
Glavin, 47, president and chief executive of the Southeastern
Legal Foundation,
said his evil twin was the real culprit. He was in U.S. District
Court in connection
with the case on Tuesday but did not enter a plea because his
hearing was rescheduled.
The foundation, led by Glavin since 1994, fought to abolish Atlanta's
affirmative action
program and sued to have Clinton disbarred for the Paula Jones
sexual harassment case.
From: CNN.com
Thanks to michael@ciswired.com
Only 108 days until Bill Clinton enters the land of never-ending oral sex.
"The era of Big Celibacy, ...is over."
Hang in there, Bill.
You can do it!
If I was Bill Clinton, I'd have Sharon Stone's name penciled in on January 21st.
Read Previous Issue
Go to bartcop.com
