Subject: a challenge to consortiumnews.com

Dear Mr. Cop,

Like many Americans, I am often victim of Nuclear Terror Panic Syndrome (a term I just coined).  
My case is mild, and only flares up during Osama's or Ayman's little fireside chats.  
Michael Scheuer, has made a career out of spreading Nuclear Panic.  The media appears 
hoodwinked by his "former CIA Agent" moniker, giving him lots of airtime for his rants, which are all the same:

1. Al Qaeda wants nukes
2. The Former Soviet Union has nukes for sale.
3. Bin Laden has retrieved Permission from some cleric to nuke the US.
4. Bin Laden has followed the usual Koranic route for offering a truce with the infidels before blowing them up.
5. Therefore we're all doomed.

He offers this up, even though there is no evidence of anyone actually buying a Soviet nuke 
(or whether there actually is such a thing as a "loose nuke").  He also ignores that whole nations 
have struggled to make their own low-yield-yet-really-heavy warheads.  Nevermind two-bit terror groups.

This is Scheuer's shtick and he's been spouting it ever since he had a book to promote.

Following is a link which to some extent debunks the nuclear terror myth.  
It is from a curious source, but it sounds more reasonable and logical than Mr Scheuer's speculative arguments.:
http://www.argee.net/DefenseWatch/The%20Atom%20Bomb%20and%20the%20Fatwa.htm

I am generally in awe of consortiumnews' articles, but they should be wary Mr. Scheuer.  
He's a Major Chicken Little.

Thanks,
 Mike
 

Mike, you have confused me. 
Let's look at that list:

1. Al Qaeda wants nukes

Are you saying Al Qaeda does not want nukes?
Why kill 3,000 if you can kill 3 million?
 

2. The Former Soviet Union has nukes for sale.

Are you saying the former Soviet Union does not have nukes for sale?
That would mean all of those 15,000 (guessing) nukes were accounted for
by wise, accurate and honest military men in the former Soviet Union,
men who didn't need the millions a nuke would bring them.
.
I'm afraid I'd have to disagree with your positive assessment.
 

3. Bin Laden has retrieved Permission from some cleric to nuke the US.

He doesn't need permission - did he get permission for 9-11?
 

4. Bin Laden has followed the usual Koranic route for offering a truce with the infidels before blowing them up.

To dupe his sheep, he would follow that plan, I'd think.
 

5. Therefore we're all doomed.

I'm not saying he's an expert, but John Kerry said he expects a nuclear attack on American soil
"in the near or very near future."    (Check Wolf the whore transcripts for the last Sunday in January 06.)
 

I confess, I didn't read your link.
But you'd need really, really solid proof to get me to agree that Robert Parry was acting irresponsibly.
 


 back to  bartcop.com
 


 
 
Current Issue
Back Issues
About BartCop.com 
Members (need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Donate Once
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
BartCop:
Entertainment
The Forum  - bartcopforum@yahoo.com
Live CHAT
The Reader
Bart Cook
Sports
Stickers
Bookstore
More Links
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo
EVEN MORE LINKS

 
Web BartCop.com


 


Search Now:
 
In Association with Amazon.com



 
Link Roll
Altercation
American Politics Journal 
Atrios
Barry Crimmins 
Buzzflash 
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Gene Lyons 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media 
Whitehouse.org
More Links

 
Privacy Policy
. .