Current Issue
Back Issues
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
The Forum  -
The Reader
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo


Search Now:
In Association with

Link Roll
American Politics Journal
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor -
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media
More Links


Locations of visitors to this page

GOP's Tucson bait-and-switch
  by Michael Kinsley


Since the Tucson massacre, pleas for “civility” have turned into accusations of incivility, and the whole,
useful discussion of “civility” versus “vitriol” has turned into the usual argument over competitive victimhood.
The vast right-wing conspiracy has played Obama like a violin.

What else is new?

And they’ve done a pretty good job of messing with the heads of the liberal media as well. As a result,
anyone who even raises the issue of who might be responsible, or more responsible, for the “atmosphere
of vitriol” in which we conduct our politics is guilty of contributing to it. In just a few days, it has become
the height of political incorrectness to suggest there might be any connection between the voices on
right-wing talk radio and the voices in Jared Lee Loughner’s head.

Republicans generally praised Obama’s speech at the memorial service in which he took care
to absolve
conservatives of any special responsibility for the tone of the political debate.

Well of course he did.
His primary goal, it seems, is to keep the Republicans happy.

Democrats praised the speech, too. So did the editorial pages. Why not? It had been practically dictated
to him by every voice speaking out in the previous week. Given Obama’s conciliatory nature and the
rhetorical beating he has been taking lately, the opportunity to earn some “bring us together” points was irresistible.

Obama’s conciliatory nature?
How can one be conciliatory to this?

Any decision to put politics aside is inevitably political. A politician will put politics aside when
it is politically helpful to do so. Obama clearly made the right call, under the circumstances.
His poll numbers are already up. He is a statesman again, for the moment. But the circumstances
were created largely by the political instincts of his political enemies, who are no less his enemies
than they were a week ago.

No, you have that wrong, Michael.
Bitch and Boner are Obama's friends and co-workers.

Even more remarkably, in the past week, the question of whether an assassination attempt on
a member of the United States Congress might have had anything to do with politics has been
mocked into oblivion.

And Obama agreed with that when he absolved the Republicans of any blame.

Well, let’s see. The dominant theme of Loughner’s ravings was suspicion of the government.
He apparently didn’t believe in paper money and thought only gold has value.

So, he listens to Glenn Beck a lot - no way we can blame the Republicans, tho.
All they've done is scream, "Obama and the Democrats are destroying America."
No harm there...

No one is suggesting that one of those voices in the assassin’s head was John Boehner’s cigarette
growl or that Loughner had even heard of Sarah Palin when he started saying nutty, paranoid things.

Why not?
Who thinks the AZ shooter got his "I hate the government" crap from a Democrat?

The suggestion is that we live in a political atmosphere in which nutty views (Obama isn’t a US citizen.)
and alarming rhetoric (“Second Amendment remedies”) are widespread and often go unrebutted.

It's a FACT that those nutty-ass assertions go unrebutted because the Democrats can't be bothered.
Democrats would rather lose their senate and House seats than be bothered to fight for them.

The suggestion, finally, is that the right is largely responsible for a political atmosphere in which
extreme thoughts are more likely to take root and flower.

But all of this is now too uncivil to bring up. So wherever could Loughner have gotten his
paranoid contempt for government? Who told him that the government was this hulking,
all-powerful “other” determined to control and ruin his life?

Official answer: He’s crazy! What more do you need to know?

There's something that nobody has said yet - he shot up a crowd of DEMOCRATS.
If this wasn't a political shooting, why didn't he shoot up a McDonalds at luchtime?

He went out of his way to shoot the Demo Represetative and anyone who came to meet her
so I wish people would stop saying "He was just a crazy man."

He was a crazy man who wanted to kills some liberals and he didn't
get that idea from the liars who say we're out to destroy America?


I knew right away that the Democrats would refuse to use the shooting to their advantage.
That's the same old surrender-early-and-often Democrats I know so well.
They don't want to win "that way."

They don't want to win bad enough to work for it.

If victory knocks on the Democrats' door, they miiiiiiiiiiight answer it,
but they damn sure aren't going to get off the couch and work for victory.


  Back to

Send e-mail to Bart

Privacy Policy
. .