Current Issue
Back Issues
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
The Forum  -
The Reader
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo


Search Now:
In Association with

Link Roll
American Politics Journal
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor -
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media
More Links


Locations of visitors to this page

Rich getting much richer
So, of course, they need tax relief


If you asked Americans how much of the nation's pretax income goes to the top 10 percent of households,
it is unlikely they would come anywhere close to 50 percent, which is where it was just before the bubble
burst in 2007… Even within that top "decile," the distribution is remarkably skewed. By 2007, the top 1 percent
of households took home 23 percent of the national income after a 15-year run in which they captured more
than half – yes, you read that right, more than half – of the country’s economic growth. As Tim Noah noted
recently in a wonderful series of articles in Slate, that’s the kind of income distribution you’d associate with a
banana republic or a sub-Saharan kleptocracy, not the world’s oldest democracy and wealthiest market economy...

There are moral and political reasons for caring about this dramatic skewing of income, which in the real world
leads to a similar skewing of opportunity, social standing and political power. But there is also an important
economic reason: Too much inequality, just like too little, appears to reduce global competitiveness and
long-term growth, at least in developed countries like ours...

People don’t work hard, take risks and make sacrifices if they think the rewards will all flow to others.
Conservative Republicans use this argument all the time in trying to justify lower tax rates for wealthy
earners and investors, but they chose to ignore it when it comes to the incomes of everyone else.

It’s no coincidence that polarization of income distribution in the United States coincides with a polarization
of the political process. Just as income inequality has eroded any sense that we are all in this together, it has
also eroded the political consensus necessary for effective government. There can be no better proof of that
proposition than the current election cycle, in which the last of the moderates are being driven from the political
process and the most likely prospect is for years of ideological warfare and political gridlock.

I remember reading about Henry Ford.

Someone asked him why he paid his employees so much and he replied,
"I want them to be able to afford to buy a new Ford."

<>Today's Rethugs aren't that forward-looking.
They're doing away with the middle class - stealing them blind - with no regard
for the fact that people with no money aren't going to do a lot of shopping.

Today's Rethugs are as greedy as oil men.
They aren't happy being billionaires because they know some other billionaire has more
than they have and that totally pisses them off so they ramp up their energy so they can
steal every last nickel from every last former middle-class American.

  Back to

Send e-mail to Bart

Privacy Policy
. .