Current Issue
Back Issues
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
The Forum  -
The Reader
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo


Search Now:
In Association with

Link Roll
American Politics Journal
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor -
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media
More Links


Locations of visitors to this page

Will 'civility' help Democrats?
Is a third grader asking that question?


If the current frenzy for "civility" means Republicans have to take the sharp edges off their
Tea Partyish rhetoric, will that really help Democrats? Democrats may think so.

Byron York speculates that they're quietly congratulating Obama for raising the civility issue
in his Tucson address even as he denied that incivility had anything to do with the shooting
 - a strategy Obamaphile Jon Alter had advocated before the speech. Boy did it make Palin look bad!

What's more, just when the number of GOP representatives is about to dwarf the number of
Democrats who'll be listening to the State of the Union address, there's MSM momentum behind
the idea that the parties should sit in an interspersed jumble so viewers won't be able to tell.


Republicans are in a position to be mean to Democrats, and there's suddenly a campaign
against meanness. What a happy coincidence!
But, like many seemingly clever, intuitive MSM/Dem strategies - "Let's nominate a Vietnam
war hero to run against President Bush!" - this one may prove to be a dud, or worse.

There's a reason, after all, why the White House has consistently attacked and therefore
elevated relatively intemperate Republican figures such as Pigboy and Glenn Beck (Rape & Murder)
 —making them the public faces of the GOP. The reason is that wild Beckish rhetoric turns off
independent and moderate voters. For the same reason, the White House has always seemed to
kind of like having the Birthers around. They're a great foil.
Why would Republican politicians ever fall into this "too hot" trap? Because hot rhetoric gins up
their base. But now that they've won the House in an off year election, GOP pols don't need to
please the base so much. They need the middle. They need swing congressmen to vote for their
bills and they need supportive poll numbers to encourage those congressmen to do so.

If a "civility" crusade succeeds in getting the most volatile Republicans to cool it and stop irritating
the center, it won't be doing Obama's work for him. It will be doing John Boehner's work for him.

If Obama and the Democrats want to use civility as a tactic, I'm all for that.
But Obama, so far, has shown he doesn't have the heart to play in the big leagues.

He tends to go into these negotiations with "Surrender" written on his forehead
and he's proven again and again that he has trouble learning from his mistakes.

I'm hoping he'll learn/change but in his first two years, a gambler can make
more money betting on Obama to surrender than to win.


  Back to

Send e-mail to Bart

Privacy Policy
. .