Current Issue
Back Issues
BartBlog
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read BartCop.com
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
BartCop:
Entertainment
The Forum  - bartcopforum@yahoo.com
Live CHAT
The Reader
Stickers
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo
EVEN MORE LINKS

 
Web BartCop.com









Search Now:
 
In Association with Amazon.com

Link Roll
Altercation
American Politics Journal
Atrios
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Buzzflash 
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor - About.com
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media 
Whitehouse.org
More Links

 





Locations of visitors to this page

The Assault on Liberty
    by Philip Restino 

        The recent passage of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 eliminated habeas corpus, a detainee's 
right to know the charges for his detainment and his right to defend himself against those charges in court. 
The act not only allows information coerced by means of torture to be incriminating, but it also retroactively 
changes the  law so as to protect anyone in the Bush administration and under its command from prosecution
for war crimes dating back to Sept. 11,  2001.
         Habeas corpus originated in the year 1215 and was shamelessly removed from the American way 
of life by President Bush "The Decider" on Oct. 17, 2006. The vague language of the Military Commissions Act 
also allows the president to decide what qualifies one as an "enemy combatant" and to whom that qualification 
applies, to include American citizens. All to protect us from terrorism.
         The Military Commissions Act of 2006 is eerily similar to Germany's  Enabling Act of 1933, the passage 
of which followed Germany's own "Sept. 11" in the burning of its parliament building, the Reichstag, on 
Feb. 27, 1933. The 1933 Enabling Act allowed Germany's own "Decider," Adolf Hitler, to take that country 
from one of a people's parliamentary government into one of a dictatorship and into the horrors of Nazism 
that spread throughout Europe for the next 12 years. The rationale given to the German people in 1933 for 
the removal of their liberties was that dictatorial powers were necessary to protect them from terrorism. 
Our own liberties have been removed for the very same reason. 
Shouldn't we be paying attention here?

         The Reichstag fire was blamed on a Communist "terrorist," Marinis Vanderlubbe, who was quickly 
tried in a show trial, similar to the  ones provided for in the language of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, 
which our so-called "representatives" in Congress voted for and which "The Decider" ceremoniously signed 
into law Oct. 17. It was after World War II during the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials of 1945, that strong 
evidence emerged indicating that German SS operatives had set the Reichstag fire.  Also at Nuremberg, 
Nazi Reich Marshal Hermann Goering made the following statement, which bears remarkable resemblance
to the Bush administration's strategy for control over the past five years: "The people can always be brought
to the bidding of the leaders. That is  easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and 
denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the  country to danger. It works the same 
in any country."
         I encourage the reader to turn off your television set and learn about the Military Commissions Act 
of  2006, the Patriot Acts, the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act of 2007, which now allows
our "Decider" to declare martial law without states' consent, and then take a few minutes to read the Bill of Rights,
if not the entire U.S. Constitution.
         Those who refuse to listen to anything unless it's from a member of  the "Party of Lincoln," might consider 
the following from President Lincoln himself: "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and 
lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
         And to those sycophants masquerading as "love it or leave it"  Americans living in our "land of the free 
and home of the brave," Lincoln had this to say: "To stand in silence when they should be protesting makes 
cowards out of men." A patriot is defined as a person who loves his or her country. 
         Waving the flag and blindly submitting oneself as an unquestioning loyalist to individuals who have taken 
charge of the government, in our case a government "of, by and for the people," as President Lincoln described 
on the bloody fields of Gettysburg, does not make one a patriot. Being a loyalist is easy. Being a patriot takes 
the courage to speak out in protest, albeit courage that any one of us can muster. Mark Twain wrote, "In the 
beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds,
the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
      During these very troubling times in our country's history when our basic liberties are under attack, 
we can choose to be a patriot, a loyalist or worse yet, to continue to sit it out.
 

Restino is co-chairman and a founding member of the Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace
and a member of Military Families Speak Out -- Florida. He lives in Daytona Beach.

Submitted by Marion
 
 
 

 

Privacy Policy
. .