|
|
|---|
|
American Politics Journal Atrios Barry Crimmins Betty Bowers Buzzflash Consortium News Daily Howler Daily Kos Democatic Underground Disinfotainment Today Evil GOP Bastards Faux News Channel Greg Palast The Hollywood Liberal Internet Weekly Jesus General Joe Conason Josh Marshall Liberal Oasis Make Them Accountable Mark Morford Mike Malloy Political Humor - About.com Political Wire Randi Rhodes Rude Pundit Smirking Chimp Take Back the Media Whitehouse.org More Links |
Subject: about those 9-11 videos
Bart,
Thanks for being patient with me on the TV Fakery
issue.
I have been spending a lot of time in the past
few days trying to correct my mistakes,
trying to understand exactly how I waswrong before.
Here it is:
The videos I'm talking about fall into two categories:
Videos of the supposed impact of a plane into
WTC 2.
and
All other videos.
The videos of the impact of a plane into WTC 2
do not depict a real plane impacting a real building.
This is almost undeniably true. I am not changing
my opinion on these videos.
With respect to the other videos, there has been
a theory that has grown over time that all or nearly
all of the videos of the "plane hit" and subsequent
burning and final destruction of the buildings are fake.
And I got caught up in that line of thinking.
There is a theory called "The Matrix" which claims
that all the videos broadcast that day came from the same camera.
This has been shown false, and I was wrong when
I believed it and promoted it. There is a theory that the Verrazzano
Bridge moved inappropriately in a video (leading
to a "video layering" theory), but this has been shown to be a natural
effect from a camera being many miles away from
a particular place using heavy zoom.
A man named Simon Shack has gone too far, and I have no more trust in him.
I want to thank you for telling me that you smelled
a rat. He is a rat! He's not a real researcher because real researchers
are grateful when you point out their mistakes.
Real researchers retract errors, as I am trying to do now.
Shack will
not correct his mistakes, and actively censors
people who criticize him.
I have recently been banned at 911movement.org
for criticizing Shack's work and my posts asking questions have
been removed from the forum. This explicitly
goes against the rules of the forum which allow polite questioning and
emphasize no censorship. I got fooled by those
people. I believed that as long as I was polite that I'd never get banned.
As soon as I started questioning Simon Shack,
though, I got banned.
The shrapnel is heaviest above the target, I suppose.
Something is weird about Simon Shack.
Your friend,
DrBabs
Send e-mail
to Bart | Discuss
it on The BartCop Forum | Comment
on it at the BartBlog