bitches - and why they lied
From: Dave Blade
Don't you understand, Bartcop, we had president
prom king ( who raped the prom queen )
from '93 to '01, and now the Issue Neglect
bill has come due, payable with penalties and interest.
Don't you understand, Bartcop, George W.
Bush is the clean-up crew for your cowardly hero,
the Big Dog, whose history of his narcissistic
behavior go back to his Attorney General days
when he was busy raping democratic contributors
like Juanita Brodderick.
Care to comment, publicly or privately?
Jose, or Dave,
Your side couldn't beat Clinton in fair elections, so they paid
trailer tramps to make false claims.
There was never any evidence that Clinton raped anybody, but
a dirty story sells newspapers, books
and TV commercial time on the "liberal media," so they alllll
ran with the money-making bonanza.
That horseshit was
always as credible as the baby Clinton fathered with the crack whore.
Nevermind that the DNA proved the baby wasn't his, it still
made a good story for the whore media.
If you knew anything about Brodderick's claim, you know she was
beaten "so badly" that her husband
never noticed her injuries. Then, too bizarre for words,
she later claimed Clinton had raped her a second time.
Paula Jones was another one.
Richard Mellon Scaife paid David Brock $80,000
to go to Arkansas to speak with disgruntled state troopers
who were also paid $80,000
by Scaife to fabricate stories about Clinton. Brock's article
was printed by the
Scaife-financed American Spectator, and when the story ran,
Paula Jones ran into the national spotlight screaming,
"That's me! I'm the Paula in
the book! That's me, me, me, me!"
Then, because she was so hurt by the terrible ordeal, she
filed a sexual harrassment lawsuit.
Did she file a suit against David Brock for writing the article?
Did she file a suit against the magazine that printed the article?
Did she file a suit against the men who mentioned that "Paula"
was a whore?
Did she file a suit against the trooper who claimed Paula asked
if she could be "Clinton's regular whore?"
Did she file a suit against Scaife for financing the whole
No, even tho Scaife has billions.
She sued Clinton,
who had no money and nothing to do with the article.
...and you see that as proof that Clinton attacked Paula Jones?
By the way, you know who had the first Paula Jones interview
Pat Robertson - the "honest and truthful" Christian gazillionaire.
Somehow, I doubt Christ would've participated in this vulgar political
To this day, Rush says Clinton ordered Randy Weaver murdered in
the summer of 1992, but the facts
(if anyone cares) remind us that Clinton was still governor of
Arkansas in 1992 - hardly in a position to
order the FBI to do a goddamn thing, but the right-wingers can
make more money with that lie.
Almost every day, some right-wing loon reminds the sheep that
Clinton and Reno personally roasted
Koresh's kids in Waco, even though Senator John Danforth (one
of the last sane Republicans) said in
his official report that there was "100
percent, absolutely no chance" the government started that fire.
But the right-wingers can make more money with the lie - so they
go with that instead of the truth.
Let's talk a little more about Juanita, Paula and Monica.
Since neither you nor I could possibly know the truth about Paula
or Juanita, I formed a theory:
Juanita, Paula and Monica had something in common. It's
my opinion that they may have had
a sexual experience with a handsome and charismatic AG, Governor
What's the difference between the two women with wild claims
Monica had no husband to answer to.
Here's one way it COULD have happened:
AG Bill meets Juanita in Fort Smith in 1978 (whatever). They had
a mutual spark that ended with a
quickie tryst in one of the empty rooms at Juanita's nursing
home. When it was over, Juanita couldn't
wait to run and tell her little friends about her exciting adventure
with the JFK look-alike.
I mean, what's the point of sleeping with Superman if you can't
So Juanita told her story far and wide - to everyone who'd listen.
The story buzzed all around Fort Smith - that Juanita had bagged
the Attorney General.
Then one day, her husband heard the story and confronted her with
With her marriage at stake, what choice did she have? She decided
to go with
"Yes, ...we had sex, ...but I didn't want
to. Yeah, ...that's the ticket. ...he FORCED me.
You see, Honey, I love you sooooo
much, I would NEVER willingly have sex with anybody else,
but that evil Clinton ...forced me
into a room, raped and beat me up real bad and then laughed at me."
America refused to believe her, no matter how hard NBC's Lisa
Meyers and Fox News pushed her claims.
Years later, the story goes, the troopers guarding the governor
were doing what guards do.
They drove the governor places and facilitated those who were
meeting with the governor.
According to Paula's only witness, Trooper Ferguson, it
was his job that day to escort Paula to the
governor's private hotel suite, which he claims he did. he said
Paula was inside with the governor for a while.
When Paula came out, Ferguson says she asked him if she could
be Clinton's "regular."
Like with Juanita, Paula couldn't wait to run and tell her little
friends that she had provided oral sex to the
handsome and charismatic JFK look-alike. She told everyone who
would listen, "I blew the Governor."
Sometime later, she met and married the extra-rabid, Clinton hating
When the story pops up about the "Paula" in Brock's article,
at least according to
Paula's sister, she said, "Either way,
this smells like money."
Penthouse Magazine interviewed the manager
of the shoe store where Paula worked. He said Paula was
fired for always asking customers, "Would
you like to see my breasts?" But since Paula had a vulgar
claim against the guy who beat up two GOP
war heroes, the Christian right adopted her as their super-chaste
Christian heroine. To me, that's just proof
the Christian right is nothing but a bunch of opportunistic whores.
But Paula - she eventually married to the extra-rabid, Clinton-hating
Steve Jones, so she couldn't confess
that the lips Steve had been kissing all this time had blown
the handsome governor, so she came up with a
modified Juanita defense - "Clinton
tried to assault me, ...but failed."
She even provided the salacious dialog. "Would
you kiss it?"
On the last day she was legally able, Paula filed a sexual
harrassment suit, claiming that the ultra-vengeful Clinton
blocked her meteoric rise in Arkansas state government. But there
was a problem - Paula was never blocked.
She'd gotten regular raises and promotions. In her legal
brief, (prepared with assistance from Kenneth Starr)
she mentioned that the other secretaries got flowers on
Secretary's Day - but not her.
Please take a moment to pity poor Paula
Jones, who failed to get flowers on Secretary's Day.
Since she had no grounds for harrassment (meaning job difficulties
for 'not putting out') there was never any reason
to file the frivolous lawsuit, but the Supreme Court was aching
for a GOP president, so the crooked bastards
who swore on a Bible to judge cases fairly green-lighted
the lawsuit without merit and America's whore media
found the widest and most profitable vein of political gold in
all of electronic history.
It was always a set up, but the American people
never fell for it.
During impeachment, Clinton's approval rating was in the seventies.
All we need to remember about Monica is she didn't have an angry
husband who was
demanding an excuse when she got caught telling her friends that
she was blowing the President.
Since there was no reason to fabricate a reason for having sex,
Monica didn't cry rape.
Had Monica been married an extra-rabid, Clinton hater, she might've
had no recourse but to use a
modified Juanita defense or a modified Paula defense and fabricate
some wild claim about being attacked.
So, we have no way of knowing the real truth, do we?
By all accounts, Bill Clinton is a charmer.
Clinton has been called "very, very charming"
by Trent Lott, Bill O'Reilly, Rush the vulgar Pigboy,
Newt Gingrich and others and I guarantee Bill never
asked those men for any sexual favors.
(Unless you count the reaming Clinton gave Newt over shutting
down the government in 1995)
So, assuming that Lott, O'Reilly, Rush and Newt are telling the
truth about the Clinton charm,
what makes you think Bill Clinton needed to use force to get
these women to "favor" him?
Obviously, being from the other side of the political aisle, it's
to your advantage to label the charming
and charismatic Clinton as "a rapist" because he defeated your
two war heroes in national elections
and "stole" the White House away from it's rightful owners, the
And, as I always do when this subject comes up, I'd like to thank
the Republicans for using something
besides a 30.06 in their attempt destroy Bill Clinton.
That's very nice of you. Thanks, I really mean it.
But the evidence tells me the women enjoyed their dalliance with
The Charmer so much that they couldn't
help but tell everyone they met. And when the story
came back to the men in their lives, they were left
with few options so they went with the guaranteed GOP money.
As a Republican, you'd be crazy to allow the facts in this case
to enter into your mind.
You've convinced yourself that Clinton is the anti-Christ.
Nobody is going to change that.
Of all the allegations leveled at Bill Clinton, his refusal to
state that he had "sexual relations" with Monica
(the letter of the law agrees with Clinton), that's the only
"crime" your side has come close to proving.
...but you HAVE to hate him, so you buy into the lies of the "we
love-a-scandal" whore media.
Clinton has had more press than Jesus, World War II, Elvis, Sinatra,
Vietnam and The Beatles combined,
and all the only "crimes" they ever proved was some semi-sex
between two consenting adults.
Get over it.
Back to Bartcop.com
to Bart | Discuss
it on The BartCop Forum | Comment
on it at the BartBlog