Current Issue
Back Issues
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
The Forum  -
The Reader
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo


Search Now:
In Association with

Link Roll
American Politics Journal
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor -
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media
More Links


Locations of visitors to this page

Clinton's bitches - and why they lied

 From: Dave Blade

 Don't you understand, Bartcop, we had president prom king ( who raped the prom queen )
 from '93 to '01, and now the Issue Neglect bill has come due, payable with penalties and interest.

 Don't you understand, Bartcop, George W. Bush is the clean-up crew for your cowardly hero,
 the Big Dog, whose history of his narcissistic behavior go back to his Attorney General days
 when he was busy raping democratic contributors like Juanita Brodderick.

 Care to comment, publicly or privately?


 Jose, or Dave,
 Your side couldn't beat Clinton in fair elections, so they paid trailer tramps to make false claims.
 There was never any evidence that Clinton raped anybody, but a dirty story sells newspapers, books
 and TV commercial time on the "liberal media," so they alllll ran with the money-making bonanza.

 That horseshit was always as credible as the baby Clinton fathered with the crack whore.
 Nevermind that the DNA proved the baby wasn't his, it still made a good story for the whore media.

 If you knew anything about Brodderick's claim, you know she was beaten "so badly" that her husband
 never noticed her injuries.  Then, too bizarre for words, she later claimed Clinton had raped her a second time.

 Paula Jones was another one.

 Richard Mellon Scaife paid David Brock $80,000 to go to Arkansas to speak with disgruntled state troopers
 who were also paid $80,000 by Scaife to fabricate stories about Clinton.   Brock's article was printed by the
Scaife-financed American Spectator, and when the story ran, Paula Jones ran into the national spotlight screaming,
"That's me! I'm the Paula in the book! That's me, me, me, me!"

 Then, because she was so hurt by the terrible ordeal, she filed a sexual harrassment lawsuit.

 Did she file a suit against David Brock for writing the article?

 Did she file a suit against the magazine that printed the article?

 Did she file a suit against the men who mentioned that "Paula" was a whore?

 Did she file a suit against the trooper who claimed Paula asked if she could be "Clinton's regular whore?"

 Did she file a suit against Scaife for financing the whole scam?
 No, even tho Scaife has billions.

 She sued Clinton, who had no money and nothing to do with the article.

 ...and you see that as proof that Clinton attacked Paula Jones?

 By the way, you know who had the first Paula Jones interview on TV?
 Pat Robertson - the "honest and truthful" Christian gazillionaire.

 Somehow, I doubt Christ would've participated in this vulgar political charade.

 To this day, Rush says Clinton ordered Randy Weaver murdered in the summer of 1992, but the facts
 (if anyone cares) remind us that Clinton was still governor of Arkansas in 1992 - hardly in a position to
 order the FBI to do a goddamn thing, but the right-wingers can make more money with that lie.

 Almost every day, some right-wing loon reminds the sheep that Clinton and Reno personally roasted
 Koresh's kids in Waco, even though Senator John Danforth (one of the last sane Republicans) said in
 his official report that there was "100 percent, absolutely no chance" the government started that fire.

 But the right-wingers can make more money with the lie - so they go with that instead of the truth.

 Let's talk a little more about Juanita, Paula and Monica.
 Since neither you nor I could possibly know the truth about Paula or Juanita, I formed a theory:

 Juanita, Paula and Monica had something in common.  It's my opinion that they may have had
 a sexual experience with a handsome and charismatic AG, Governor or President.

 What's the difference between the two women with wild claims and Monica?

 Monica had no husband to answer to.

 Here's one way it COULD have happened:


 AG Bill meets Juanita in Fort Smith in 1978 (whatever). They had a mutual spark that ended with a
 quickie tryst in one of the empty rooms at Juanita's nursing home. When it was over, Juanita couldn't
 wait to run and tell her little friends about her exciting adventure with the JFK look-alike.
 I mean, what's the point of sleeping with Superman if you can't tell anybody?

 So Juanita told her story far and wide - to everyone who'd listen.
 The story buzzed all around Fort Smith - that Juanita had bagged the Attorney General.

 Then one day, her husband heard the story and confronted her with it.

 With her marriage at stake, what choice did she have? She decided to go with
"Yes, ...we had sex, ...but I didn't want to. Yeah, ...that's the ticket. ...he FORCED me.
  You see, Honey, I love you sooooo much, I would NEVER willingly have sex with anybody else,
  but that evil Clinton ...forced me into a room, raped and beat me up real bad and then laughed at me."

 America refused to believe her, no matter how hard NBC's Lisa Meyers and Fox News pushed her claims.


 Years later, the story goes, the troopers guarding the governor were doing what guards do.
 They drove the governor places and facilitated those who were meeting with the governor.

 According to Paula's only witness, Trooper Ferguson, it was his job that day to escort Paula to the
 governor's private hotel suite, which he claims he did. he said Paula was inside with the governor for a while.
 When Paula came out, Ferguson says she asked him if she could be Clinton's "regular."

 Like with Juanita, Paula couldn't wait to run and tell her little friends that she had provided oral sex to the
 handsome and charismatic JFK look-alike. She told everyone who would listen, "I blew the Governor."

 Sometime later, she met and married the extra-rabid, Clinton hating Steve Jones.
 When the story pops up about the "Paula" in Brock's article, at least according to
 Paula's sister, she said, "Either way, this smells like money."

 Penthouse Magazine interviewed the manager of the shoe store where Paula worked.  He said Paula was
 fired for always asking customers, "Would you like to see my breasts?"   But since Paula had a vulgar
 claim against the guy who beat up two GOP war heroes, the Christian right adopted her as their super-chaste
 Christian heroine. To me, that's just proof the Christian right is nothing but a bunch of opportunistic whores.

 But Paula - she eventually married to the extra-rabid, Clinton-hating Steve Jones, so she couldn't confess
 that the lips Steve had been kissing all this time had blown the handsome governor, so she came up with a
 modified Juanita defense - "Clinton tried to assault me, ...but failed."

 She even provided the salacious dialog. "Would you kiss it?"

 On the last day she was legally able, Paula filed a sexual harrassment suit, claiming that the ultra-vengeful Clinton
 blocked her meteoric rise in Arkansas state government. But there was a problem - Paula was never blocked.
 She'd gotten regular raises and promotions.  In her legal brief, (prepared with assistance from Kenneth Starr)
 she mentioned that the other secretaries got flowers on Secretary's Day - but not her.

 Please take a moment to pity poor Paula Jones, who failed to get flowers on Secretary's Day.

 Since she had no grounds for harrassment (meaning job difficulties for 'not putting out') there was never any reason
 to file the frivolous lawsuit, but the Supreme Court was aching for a GOP president, so the crooked bastards
 who swore on a Bible to judge cases fairly green-lighted the lawsuit without merit and America's whore media
 found the widest and most profitable vein of political gold in all of electronic history.

 It was always a set up, but the American people never fell for it.
 During impeachment, Clinton's approval rating was in the seventies.


 All we need to remember about Monica is she didn't have an angry husband who was
 demanding an excuse when she got caught telling her friends that she was blowing the President.

 Since there was no reason to fabricate a reason for having sex, Monica didn't cry rape.

 Had Monica been married an extra-rabid, Clinton hater, she might've had no recourse but to use a
 modified Juanita defense or a modified Paula defense and fabricate some wild claim about being attacked.

 So, we have no way of knowing the real truth, do we?
 By all accounts, Bill Clinton is a charmer.

 Clinton has been called "very, very charming" by Trent Lott, Bill O'Reilly, Rush the vulgar Pigboy,
 Newt Gingrich and others and I guarantee Bill never asked those men for any sexual favors.
 (Unless you count the reaming Clinton gave Newt over shutting down the government in 1995)

 So, assuming that Lott, O'Reilly, Rush and Newt are telling the truth about the Clinton charm,
 what makes you think Bill Clinton needed to use force to get these women to "favor" him?

 Obviously, being from the other side of the political aisle, it's to your advantage to label the charming
 and charismatic Clinton as "a rapist" because he defeated your two war heroes in national elections
 and "stole" the White House away from it's rightful owners, the Godlike Republicans.

 And, as I always do when this subject comes up, I'd like to thank the Republicans for using something
 besides a 30.06 in their attempt destroy Bill Clinton.    That's very nice of you.   Thanks, I really mean it.

 But the evidence tells me the women enjoyed their dalliance with The Charmer so much that they couldn't
 help but tell everyone they met. And when the story came back to the men in their lives, they were left
 with few options so they went with the guaranteed GOP money.

 As a Republican, you'd be crazy to allow the facts in this case to enter into your mind.
 You've convinced yourself that Clinton is the anti-Christ.  Nobody is going to change that.

 Of all the allegations leveled at Bill Clinton, his refusal to state that he had "sexual relations" with Monica
 (the letter of the law agrees with Clinton), that's the only "crime" your side has come close to proving.

 ...but you HAVE to hate him, so you buy into the lies of the "we love-a-scandal" whore media.

 Clinton has had more press than Jesus, World War II, Elvis, Sinatra, Vietnam and The Beatles combined,
 and all the only "crimes" they ever proved was some semi-sex between two consenting adults.

 Get over it.

Privacy Policy
. .

  Back to

Send e-mail to Bart  |  Discuss it on The BartCop ForumComment on it at the BartBlog

Privacy Policy
. .