Current Issue
Back Issues
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
The Forum  -
The Reader
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo


Search Now:
In Association with

Link Roll
American Politics Journal
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor -
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media
More Links


Locations of visitors to this page





Subject: re: Snowden rejoinder

My point is that I think you’re mistaking the forest for the trees.  The deed is done. 
The bell cannot be un-rung.  For better or ill, Snowden is part of world history now,
and whether he finds asylum or dies trying cannot change that.  Is in fact beside the point,
making allowances for natural human empathy.

Our attention should be focused laser-like on this: We were led to believe that Total Information
Awareness had been killed in its crib during the Bush administration, but Snowden’s selfless action
has provided us with irrefutable proof that was a lie.  So now we know that a means has been created
to identify malcontents, pretty much all malcontents, everywhere, putting the Stasi to shame. 

We know that an infrastructure has been created to deal as necessary with “unrest” caused by
people attempting to exercise their constitutional rights, or maybe just trying to scare up a scrap of bread. 
See: creation of NORTHCOM; militarization of police departments; implementation of fusion centers;
FAA actions to integrate drones into U.S. airspace, etc., etc.

Many people see these developments as very serious threats to our liberty. 
What can we/are we going to do about it?  I don’t know yet. 
But far greater minds than mine are on the case, and I plan to be paying close attention. 
In sum, I think it’s a head in the sand position to say, as you did (quoted below):

Dave: Answer me one simple question, please: 
Would you REALLY rather not know what Snowden revealed? 

Bart: It doesn't make much difference.
My life is exactly the same as it was before Snowden turned criminal.

Don’t kid yourself, you are a public figure. Your life could change in an instant if the cards
fell the wrong way… And don’t you think it’s just as premature for you to pronounce Snowden
a criminal, as it might be for me to nominate him for Mt. Rushmore?  Washington and Jefferson
were denounced as traitors and criminals, but they made the cut.

Dave from Delaware

I'm floored that you'd use Snowden's name in the same breath as Washington and Jefferson.
You obviously like the guy (selfless?) but for your sake, I hope he turns out to be a good guy.

BTW, all that tracking software is here and it's not going anywhere. Seems the best you could
hope for is to push for legislation that guarantees jail time for those who abuse that software.


Send e-mail to Bart

  Back to


Privacy Policy
. .