Current Issue
Back Issues
BartBlog
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read BartCop.com
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
BartCop:
Entertainment
The Forum  - bartcopforum@yahoo.com
Live CHAT
The Reader
Stickers
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo
EVEN MORE LINKS

 
Web BartCop.com









Search Now:
 
In Association with Amazon.com

Link Roll
Altercation
American Politics Journal
Atrios
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Buzzflash 
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor - About.com
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media 
Whitehouse.org
More Links

 





Locations of visitors to this page

From: microbank

Subject: more on 'The GOP says thanks"

Bart,

The first point of my email was that we're currently in the primary race, NOT the general election.
You chose not to respond to that point at all so I thank you for your tacit admission (a la Colbert )

It's because I'm afraid - just kidding.
The season we're in changes nothing.
Attacking Hillary with "That wench is evil" helps them when it counts.

As to Hillary leading in the race, it looks like you're using a circular argument. I suggested that the basis
you offer for your support is that, according to polls, she's 20 points ahead.  That information is obtained
from a mainstream media that lives to serve the neo-con agenda, though, so how do you know?

She's 20 points ahead in almost every national poll.
If we take "the whore press" too far, we never landed on the moon.
I'm saying the whore press can't be trusted - completely.

You replied:

>I don't think she'll win because I was told that by somebody.
>I believe in science, math and logic.
>She's ahead by 20 points "

What's your source?  Are you suggesting that when it comes to the primaries, suddenly the media (and Gallup, et al)
is honest and NOT working in the best interests of the GOP?  Are you suggesting that the GOP wouldn't try to
shape the race by influencing who gets the Dem nomination?

I think I answered that, but you couldn't know till now.
I think HRC is their only lose-for-sure, so why would the MSM push her?

You wrote:
>Your position seems to be "all the polls are lying."
>How do you defend that? "

Fortunately, I don't have to defend that position because it's not my position.
It would be illogical to speak to "all polls"

Picky, picky, picky.
She's so far ahead, we don't even know who #2 is.
If you're point is, "Maybe she's not the front-runner," good luck to ya.

However, several of your readers have written to point out that (admittedly informal) polls conducted by sites
that cater to the "lefties" (that is, not working for the GOP) regularly show Hillary losing to other candidates.
You dismiss them outright in favor of information obtained from some other (as yet unnamed) source.
As you said, "I'm sorry things aren't working out more to your liking, but it's illogical to ignore the facts "

Damn, I should hire you.
Kos showed her at 1 percent because Kos runs rigged polls.
He hides behind "I didn't say it - they did," but c'mon.
Our front-runner can't beat "I don't know" at Kos?
Who buys that?

Irony: When she gets sworn in - you watch - she'll save a seat for Kos but not me.

You wrote:
>If someone wants to attack Hillary on the facts nobody can stop that, but
>"Hilary is not even a Democrat.
>Bill Clinton's greed was classic GOP.
>First Wench"
is just horseshit - why do you fail to grasp the difference? "

I never said any of those things.  Why would you ascribe them to me
and what makes you think I "fail to grasp the difference?"

Because that's what you responded to.
I said, "Personal attacks against our front-runner hurt us"
and you chimed in to tell me how wrong I was.

Again, thanks for your time
 macrobank

As always, I enjoyed the tangle.
I hope I was polite in battle.
 

Send e-mail to Bart  |  Discuss it on The BartCop ForumComment on it at the BartBlog
 

Privacy Policy