Current Issue
Back Issues
BartBlog
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read BartCop.com
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
BartCop:
Entertainment
The Forum  - bartcopforum@yahoo.com
Live CHAT
The Reader
Stickers
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo
EVEN MORE LINKS

 
Web BartCop.com









Search Now:
 
In Association with Amazon.com

Link Roll
Altercation
American Politics Journal
Atrios
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Buzzflash 
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor - About.com
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media 
Whitehouse.org
More Links

 





Locations of visitors to this page

 
 

Subject: WMDs and Hillary

Bart, you wrote:

> "If you were willing to bet 100 million lives on that hunch, I'm glad you're not the president, either. "
 

That is a blatent lie, and you know it.  To say that Saddam had the equivilent 
of many MIRV's is just another lie to defend the liar Hillary.

Neil, are you having another bad day?

*I* didn't say saddam had MIRVs, whatever they are (drone planes?)
How would *I* know what Saddam had?
The CIA swore they did, in their top-secret briefing of the senate.
 

She said in an interview yesterday regarding her pro-war stance: "There are no do overs in life."

When she says that, I believe her.
 

I wonder if that is what she would tell an OIF (Operation Iraqi FUBAR) veteran 
who lost his legs, arms, eyes.  No, there are no do overs--for them.

Are you attempting to make a point?
I suggest we punish the lying bastard for lie-briefing the senate.
What do you suggest?
 

She is arrogant in the extreme, a representative of the moneyed elite 
(is that you?  are you being paid to blog for her?) 

ha ha
You flatter me.
She's one of the few people in politics who doesn't need me.
That guy she's married to, believe it or not, is smarter than me.

Sidebar:
I do have a bone to pick with her, tho...
I heard she launched a major "web buy" with all the "big" sites who hate her guts.
I think she should spend some money at sites where the host is neutral, like bartcop.com
If anyone out there knows Hillary's money people, mention me, would you?
I'll let you have 15% of whatever she spends here.
 

That is a serious question as other blogs have reported that that is a strategy of the Clinton campaign
--see MyDD) and you are selling out what integrity you have left  (your motto, "a smart mouth, 
a hammer and the truth" (or whatever, I don't read your page much any more) is a hypocritical joke. 

Looks like someone is reduced to name-calling because the facts aren't working so well...

One difference between us?
*I* am going to back the Demo nominee 100%.

And if everybody didn't read this web page as much as you, I'd be rich.
 

YOUR truth is VERY selective.

YOU have a banana in your hand.
No other Tequila Treehouse boss answers Monkey Mail on his/her page.
 

I very honestly and openly pointed out to you that PBS "The Independent Lens" did a long documentary on
investigative reporting that had two reporters (one from the WaHoPo) stating emphatically that the Senate
DID in fact have the very sceptical CIA report about Iraqi WMD, and chose to go along with the WH
influenced one.  A revelation--the smoking gun.  But you ignore that fact because it reveals Hillary and
the other Whore Dems for what they are.

What?
Bush had the CIA send the senate a report saying not to believe his CIA briefing guy?

I think your reality is selective.
I've never heard of dual reports.
I think you remember "funny."
 

I could not provide a transcript (still looking) as the DVD was over $400 (I'm not a Dem elite, 
out of my range, and more than I want to spend to prove a point to you who would ignore it any way). 

If there was a dual report, you'd think there'd be a mention of it on the web.
 

You choose to believe what you want to believe, like a Bush lover does--there is no difference.

You hate her a lot more than I like her.
One of us has allowed our emotions to cloud our mind.

She says Bush lied to her, you say he didn't lie - that he provided them fair and
honest reports that showed the truth about both versions - is that your position?
That Bush was fair & honest in the run-up to the war?
 

You have lost a supporter because you selectively edit out any meaningful and truthful response 
from your readers that does not agree with your propaganda.  I have contributed much that you posted 
(cartoons, articles, links) and I got your insulting one-sided edits in return.

You're a long-winded guy, as this e-mail demonstrates.
Sometimes in a long, long, litany-like rant, I find a point and respond to it,
but there's nothing you can say that I have to edit out of the conversation.

You always have the Bartblog - so far nobody has been edited there.
 

You published a copy of Perkel's letter to the NY Times; they would not publish mine, 
which simply asked "Why does the NY Times lie so much?" 

Dude, please don't list every site that refuses to print your long, long rants.
Short works a lot better than long - here and at the NYWTimes.
 

And Percel claims to be the most dangerous mind on the Web? 
I mostly agree with him, but his "dangerous' is like your "hammer and the truth".

Why, ...thank you.
 

You are far more progressive than the people you want to represent you--far more. 
Myself, I will not compromise.

If only we had more like you, Neil.
 

We desperately need meaningful change in this country--not more of the same.

You choices (probably) boil down to McCain (more war) and Hillary (less war).
Can we count on you to cast a vote against more war?
Or will you help McCain's widen Bush's war by voting for a can't-win third candidate?
 

Adios and Best Wishes for your health Bartcop.
 Neil in VT

I hope you get to feeling better, too.
 
 

 Send e-mail to Bart

 Discuss it on The Bartcop Forum
 Discuss it on the BartBlog


 back to  bartcop.com
 
 

 

Privacy Policy
. .