Current Issue
Back Issues
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
The Forum  -
The Reader
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo


Search Now:
In Association with

Link Roll
American Politics Journal
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor -
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media
More Links


Locations of visitors to this page

Paul Ryan and The Right
  by Russ the Pillar



Since Mittens was not popular among the right-wing side of the Republican't party, he needed a Tea Party mascot. 
That's where Ryan comes in.

A friend sent me to a website meant to show how badly Ryan has been treated by the "Liberal Media,"
and to correct the record.  Here are my comments about the "10 most outrageous attacks":

10.  An NPR commentator said the House was wasting time with their budget, because there was no chance it
could pass the Senate.  Randy Hall (the author of this NewsBusters piece) says it's the job of the House to start
the budget process.  While this is true, it's the job of the House to pass a realistic budget, then to negotiate it with
the Senate.  The Ryan "budget" was truly, as NPR guest Doyle McManus said, "going nowhere" because it was
actually an attempt to "restructure the tax system," not a real budget.  Everyone knew at the time that it was no
more than a political stunt.

9.  David Gregory, host of Meet the Press, asked California embarrassment Darrel Issa if Paul Ryan were
"a little too incendiary," providing traction for the left to lampoon the Romney campaign.  How is that an
outrageous question?  David Gregory is not some flaming liberal, he's a reliable voice for the Republican party. 
This question is a perfect example, letting Issa claim that Ryan is "a person of substance."

8.  CNN reported on a group of nuns pointing out that the Ryan budget does not follow Catholic priorities,
and didn't ask Ryan (who claims to be Catholic) for a response.  Since when is reporting on news an "outrageous attack?"

7.  Norah O'Donnell, on CBS, insisted that extending the Bush tax cuts would be a tax cut.  She laughed about
Ryan's statements that keeping these cuts was "tax policy" and "tax code," but insisting that they were not "cuts." 
Yes, political language is a little fluid.  The normal claim is that, if a law is passed, then you do something to
affect that law, you have changed the law -- not "kept the law as it is."  By that standard, the Bush tax cuts were
supposed to expire in 2011.  Extending them was extending a tax cut, or changing the existing law to cut taxes
-- but perhaps not, in exact parlance, itself a "tax cut."  On the other hand, if this relatively minor bit of semantics
is one of the "10 most outrageous attacks on Paul Ryan," people aren't exactly giving him a hard time.

6.  Thom Hartmann (inexplicably misspelled "Martmann" in the first line), a relatively liberal radio host who is
also a psychotherapist, said that Ryan is a sociopath.  Hartmann then went on to explain that, to a psychologist,
a psychopath is one who believes everyone else is an object to be manipulated -- sort of like how Ayn Rand
(Ryan's heroine) comes across in Atlas Shrugged.  It really looks like Ryan believes this; even going back to
his high school yearbook, where he was listed as "biggest brown-noser."

5.  Ed Schultz, moderately liberal commentator on MSNBC ("The ED Show"), commented on a clip by Ryan
that Obama is using the politics of fear to sow "social unrest and class resentment," saying that Ryan's comments
are "inciting civil war" and show that "Republicans want violence to take place in our society.  Perhaps a bit over
the top, but that's The ED Show.  Randy Hall's proof of how "outrageous" this "attack" is was simply to refer to
Ed Schultz and Alan Grayson as "lunatics."  A point here:  if Democrats are told that someone is inciting civil war
and sowing social unrest and class resentment, they will write letters to the editor.  If Republican'ts are told the
same thing, they are more likely to call for "Second Amendment solutions."

4.  Bill Maher refers to Ryan as a "heartless, smirking bastard."  "Heartless" is a good description of his policies,
"smirking" a good description of his presentation.  I suppose it's fair to claim that Ryan isn't a "bastard" if you
want to speak genealogically, but as a comment on his personality it's certainly available as an opinion.

3.  Alex Wagner, a relatively liberal MSNBC political analyst, looked at the ridiculous Ryan budget passed by
the House (see #1), saying "Some Democrats are calling it Christmas in March."  Randy Hall states this
"outrageous attack" (which is actually political news reporting) as, "MSNBC host exults in future Democrat
attacks on Ryan budget."  Not what really happened, as you can see if you even click his own links.

2.  Paul Krugman looked at the Ryan budget's replacement of Medicare by a declining-value voucher system,
and pointed out that tens of millions of the elderly would no longer be able to afford health care.  Noting that this
would lead to premature death, he stated, "To be a little melodramatic, the voucher [program] would kill people,
no question."  Actually a statement of fact, and he even called it "melodramatic."  Yet Randy Hall's description
of this "outrageous attack" is "Krugman accuses Ryan of wanting to 'kill people, no question.'"  Again, not what was said.

1.  In May, 2011, The Agenda Project (a moderate to left political action committee) visually compared Paul Ryan's
budget to pushing an elderly woman off a cliff.  Randy Hall claims the headless, suited man in the ad is a "Paul Ryan lookalike."

 I didn't think so, but then I usually assume Paul Ryan has a head.  Hall goes on to claim that this is among the
most offensive political ads in recent memory.  I don't agree; ads showing Obama as a witch doctor, or conflating
Kerry with Osama bin Laden are pretty offensive.  The "outrageous attack" was that the media ignored this ad. 
Oh, yeah, while "ignoring" it they also "laughed it off" and asked Ryan about it.  Which?  Also, Hall brings up
the zombie meme of Obama cutting $700 billion from Medicare, and compares it to the Ryan budget cutting
even more.  The difference, folks, is Obama was able to cut $700 billion from Medicare by funding it with the
Affordable Care Act; people don't lose coverage (like they would under Ryan), they get it from a different law.

A lot of this stuff is just plain wrong; some is straight-out lies. 
The rest of it calls pretty mild criticism "outrageous attacks."  What a wimp!


Send e-mail to Bart

  Back to



Send e-mail to Bart

  Back to


Privacy Policy
. .