|
|
|---|
|
American Politics Journal Atrios Barry Crimmins Betty Bowers Buzzflash Consortium News Daily Howler Daily Kos Democatic Underground Disinfotainment Today Evil GOP Bastards Faux News Channel Greg Palast The Hollywood Liberal Internet Weekly Jesus General Joe Conason Josh Marshall Liberal Oasis Make Them Accountable Mark Morford Mike Malloy Political Humor - About.com Political Wire Randi Rhodes Rude Pundit Smirking Chimp Take Back the Media Whitehouse.org More Links |
Subject: those Iran crazies
Bart,
All these people can't see the difference between
blockading Iran's ports after
giving them a bunch of weapons, then invading
them because they have weapons? (Bart vs. Cheney)
Personally, I don't like blockading Iran because
I don't believe it would be effective.
There are too many neighboring countries that
would ship things to them overland
(it may not be easy but it's been done before).
But at least you offer a possible solution,
unlike these idiots saying "How can you suggest
that?"
Russ
If a blockade was ineffective, then it wouldn't likely lead to war, right?
I think a blackade would be damned effective and here's why:
We own the seas and the skies so any oil they ship would have to be over land
Our drones could explode their pipelines way faster than they could
repair them
so their only method of transport would be trucks and how effective
is that?
Thank you for not saying "A nuclear Iran is no threat to Israel."
Most times when we talk about this, I get angry emails saying
Ahmahandjob never said he wanted "to wipe
Israel off the map."
First, unless one speaks Farsi, how could they make that claim?
Second, even if you speak Farsi, how can you claim to know every
word that has come from Ahmahandjob's mouth for all these years.
It's easy to prove what was said.
It's impossible to say what was not said.
Third, do the people making those wild claims really mean to
suggest
that Ahmahandjob has always been, and will always be, a friend to Israel?
That's crazy talk of the highest order.