Current Issue
Back Issues
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
The Forum  -
The Reader
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo


Search Now:
In Association with

Link Roll
American Politics Journal
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor -
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media
More Links


Locations of visitors to this page

The tyranny of partisan groupthink
 by Gene Lyons


Following Rand Paul's foolhardy ruminations about civil rights, a headline in the Week cut to the chase: 
"Is Rand Paul Crazy?"   Fresh from winning Kentucky's GOP primary, the sometime libertarian and Tea Party supporter 
told an interviewer that he wouldn't have supported part of the 1964 Civil Rights Act outlawing racially segregated businesses.

While he personally abhors racism and wouldn't patronize a restaurant that refused to serve African-Americans, Rand explained, 
government coercion of private associations is worse. "Does the owner of the restaurant own his restaurant?" he asked. 
"Or does the government own his restaurant?"

Sigh. Sophomoric is more like it. 

As the 47-year-old ophthalmologist was still in diapers back in 1964, he has no firsthand memory of the beatings, nightstick and 
dog attacks, murders and assassinations that accompanied the last days of Jim Crow. But anybody styling himself a "libertarian" 
ought to understand what "legal segregation" consisted of: systematic, state-sponsored denial of black citizens' constitutional rights.

Turning away black customers wasn't personal preference; across most of the South, serving them was against the law. 
Actually, I suspect that Dr. Paul does know that, and that his seeming naiveté masks a coded appeal to voters -- thankfully, 
a diminishing number -- who prate about "states' rights" as a means of expressing racial resentment.

  Back to

Send e-mail to Bart

Privacy Policy
. .