with your Penis
One thing I like to do is anticipate trouble - that makes a big difference.
I hope we don't have a problem here, but the evidence is disturbing.
A few issues ago, I pointed out the obvious, that a pretty model
will grab more attention and translate into more sales for a product.
I said that Hayden Panetierre would sell more products for you than,
Cloris Leachman because it's bene proven again and again that it works.
Why else would Verizon give Catherine Zeta Jones $10M to say, "This
is a good phone?"
So, we have to keep in mind that as backwards a cavewoman as she is,
Sarah Palin is
easy on the eyes, especially for low self-esteem men. For some men,
voting for Sarah Palin
is the closest they'll ever get to sex with a movie star and I wonder
- is that a problem?
Watching last night's debate on CNN, they had this meter that "undecided"
Ohio voters could
use to express approval or disapproval, and whenever Grumpy mentioned
running mate, the women's graph stayed even but the men shower the
mention of Palin's
name with atmospheric levels, I'd say 90% approval or more.
The f-ing idiot men - who usually vote GOP - are head-over-heels in
love with Palin.
Men often think with the wrong head, and if they let Sarah Palin sway
their vote like they'd
let Catherine Zeta Jones sway their choice for a cell phone company
- we got trouble.
I haven't seen much post debate comment, so I don't know if anyone else
picked up on this,
but those f-ing idiot men could swing a close election - all for a
goof just to have a hot VP.
The evidence was unmistakeable, but let's hope it doesn't translate
And isn't this proof that women (not Palin) would probably do a better
job in office than men?
Most men are off-the-charts sex crazy anyway, but let's hope they can
keep it in their pants
long enough to elect a team that will change the wrong direction America
is stuck on.
F-ing men - should they even be allowed to vote?
Back to Bartcop.com
to Bart | Discuss
it on The BartCop Forum | Comment
on it at the BartBlog