 |
||||
|
|
 |
|
||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
VCR Alert -
Have you seen the promos for tonight's West Wing?
Don't forget, NBC's whore promo people produced these
ads.
And they're promising the sun and the moon tonight.
If it's only half as good as it sounds, we're in for a
buckle-up.
Hear the clip
from tonight's West Wing as a 
ha ha
"What would it take to wipe them out?"
Go, Mr. President!
We need a president who isn't afraid to flex a little
muscle.
Truth be told, I wished we would've seen some of that Clinton
temper when he was C-in-C,
but no, not Bill Clinton. He was always very calm, very
restrained and very measured,
never flying off the handle,...dammit.
TONIGHT - a West Wing
Special Event
Horror in the Dust Bowl
On a hunch, I called the K-Drag NBC station and asked if we'd
be seeing
West Wing and the Angie Harmon Show tonight - or
would they be screwing us?
He said, "No, we don't care what you
want to watch - we're showing basketball AGAIN tonight."
John McCain, this is YOUR fault. McCain is chairman of the telecommunications
committee
and he took the big bribes from the people who, when it
comes to TV, aren't pro-choice.
From: boydstun4@home.com
Subject: Playing hardball
this sub that sunk the ship...civilians on board?
there better not be one SOB among the 15 civilians
that gave one penny to the bastard pepukes.
Talk about buying access. Lets have a big
investigation.
Never mind - I forgot we democrats are above
that sort of thing,
(God, I'm starting to hate being a Democrat.)
Remember when Bill got that haircut?
Boy has the tide has changed.
Boyds, good point.
We don't have any Burtons, Barrs or Hydes on our team, but I agree.
IF they were showing off for a major Republican contributor
(do they have another kind?) we should do a five-year investigation
into the sex lives of every GOP congressman who ever got a nickle from
anybody on that boat that day.
I suggest we use more FBI agents than the GOP used for the OKC bombing
and TWA #800 combined to see if any Republicans would ever lie about
sex.
Great Political Quotes
They can't let go.
They can't let go.
I'm sure they'll investigate Bill Clinton's
grandchildren.
-- Tom Daschle (D-Needs work)
From: (withheld)
Subject: This is How News Should be Reported
The media is now telling us that there were civilians at the controls
of the
submarine that caused the deaths in Hawaii.
But you know why you're not hearing Tony Snow and Hannity and O'Reilly
and Laura Ingraham talk about how bad that is?
Because they don't know who the civilians are.
If the "civilian dignitary" was a Democratic congressman or someone
like Ted Turner,
then Republicans will condemn the "murderers" while Democrats will
say this was an
accident and point out that all the guy did is pull a lever when instructed
to do so
--a lever that would have been pulled at the same moment anyway.
On the other hand, the civilian dignitary might be a hero from the right,
perhaps
Charlton Heston, Rush Limbaugh, or Timothy McVeigh. If that was
the case,
the accusations and defenses noted in the paragraph above would all
still be used,
except by opposite sides (although the Dems accusations would be significantly
reduced).
I wish all the news was like this.
We could eliminate 80% of the rancor in our political discourse if the
FACTS of the news
were presented with the caveat that the parties involved won't be revealed
for 72 hours.
What if you saw the headline:
"Presidential Candidate Arrested for DWI in '70s." Now
pretend for a moment
that the article conveyed all the essential facts, but any clues as
to the accused
(like Kennebunkport) were cleverly omitted.
Then we would have three days for the editorial boards to decide if
the story is relevant,
talk radio and hate TV would have three days to make all their comments,
and we the people
would have three days to discuss it among ourselves.
After 72 hours, we would find out who was the "culprit."
Most of the professionals wouldn't know what to say in the 72-hour period.
What would Rush say--is this allegation proof of how unfit a candidate
is,
or is it proof of what bottom-feeders the opposition is?
Depends on the size of the tax cut.
I know that waiting 72 hours to reveal "the rest of the story"
couldn't ever happen;
but I hope this illustrates how disingenuous the loudest critics on
both sides are.
They can't judge right or wrong, guilt or innocence, ability or incompetence
without first
knowing the affiliation of the subject in question (sports fans can
be the same way,
but they're just having fun; they're not hurting our democracy).
The talking heads don't know whether the visiting dignitaries were just
in
the wrong place at the wrong time or if they're guilty of murder, and
they
won't know until they found out who the visitors are. That's
lame.
The tragedy happened because they failed to scope out the area, not
because
someone pulled the wrong levers. I think that the procedures
would have
been followed exactly the same whether or not there were visitors,
and it
doesn't matter if it was a retarded kid from the "Make-a-Wish" Foundation,
Joe Montana or Saint Reagan himself who pulled the levers. They
pulled the
levers when the guy who would've pulled the levers told them to do
so.
I'm no expert, but that's my opinion, and I'm able to form it based
on the
facts as I understand them without having to check my scorecard to
see if it
was a "good" person or a "bad" person who was down there visiting.
I wish all news stories were like this and Rush could go back to his
old job
of shining Amos Otis' cleats and sniffing George Brett's jockstrap.
In Texas, Mood Swings on Taxes
By Paul Duggan, Washington Whore Post
Excerpt:
Today, with Bush in Washington, championing $1.6
trillion in federal tax relief,
many of the Texas legislators he left behind
are wearing frowns. With the economy softening,
Medicaid costs spiraling up and state budget-makers
feeling the pinch of the record-setting
'99 tax cuts that aided Bush's presidential campaign,
the mood here clearly has changed.
The Compleat Chris Rock Transcript on 8-Wives
Worth a read - the funniest man in America is good just makin' conversation.
Southern man better keep your head
Don't forget what your good book said
Southern change gonna come at last
Now your crosses are burning fast
Southern man
I saw cotton and I saw black
Tall white mansions and little shacks.
Southern man when will you pay them back?
I heard screamin' and bullwhips cracking
How long?
How long?
Southern man better keep your head
Don't forget what your good book said
Southern change gonna come at last
Now your crosses are burning fast
Southern man
Lily Belle, your hair is golden brown
I've seen your black man comin' round
Swear by God I'm gonna cut him down!
(Unless the senate Democrats
think that would be counter-productive)
I heard screamin' and bullwhips cracking
How long?
How long?
......
More Mail and Toons
From: brew@thedailybrew.com
Subject: Destroyed families
You Wrote:
(Hint: Over 100 dead just from Desert Storm.)
4. And if the subject is "destroyed families," should we talk
about the 10,000
veterans from Desert Storm afflicted with
Gulf War Syndrome?
Actually, if you count the young people with Gulf
War Syndrome who have DIED in the prime of their lives
from diseases that usually ONLY afflict old people
in the ten years since the end of the conflict, the Desert
Storm Body Count is closer to 6,000.
My source is NPR. (And if my source isn't good enough for any of
the members of the VRWC who lurk at Bartcop,
I invite them to prove the negative, just like they have
asked Clinton to do for eight years (now going
on nine) for every horseshit
scandal they dreamed up.
Then they can kiss my ass,
cause I know what I heard, the number was 6,000
DEAD from Gulf War Syndrome since 1991,
and it was on the only talk radio left in the
whole country that even occasionally tells the truth.)
brew
www.thedailybrew.com
Brew, it's funny, I support our troops 100 percent,
but I can't understand why military families would rather have
their kids come home in body bags under Reagan or Bush than
having them come home happy and healthy under the bad, bad Clinton
monster.
Clinton never sent a man into battle who didn't come home.
...and they hate him double for that.
Crime Pays
Katherine Harris gets
her Payoff for certifying "quick count" for Smirk
Excerpt:
We must ask ourselves how and why Katherine
Harris---the hateful and venomous apparatchik
whose sole career accomplishments were
to have affairs with both Bush brothers and to commit
election fraud and treason---was invited
to join one of the most dominant (and some would say
the most influential) cabals on the face
of the earth.
Great Political Quotes
George W. Bush is like a bad comic working
the crowd.
A moron - if you'll pardon the expression.
-- President Bartlet
From: cbh7@psu.edu
Subject: BartCop TV?
BartCop,
I was just wondering if you could update us on
the BartCop TV dealie?
It'd be killer if it went through...
Corey
We don't know anything.
The meeting with Christian was ...non-productive.
Christian reports Scary Perry replied, "None of your business,"
whenever she asked him about the plan, the format, the timing etc.
Meanwhile, Perry told me "All is going good."
I don't have much experience with these Hollywood types.
They say secrecy is Job One.
Hollywood Funny
The Grammys are a week from tonight and they have no host yet!
Whoo-pie was supposed to do it, but she hurt her back.
They asked super-diva (and Giuliani/Monica wannabe) Bette Midler
and Bette said, "Sure, I'll do it for $250,000."
So they still have no host.
Swear to Koresh, I've gotten several e-mails saying,
"I thought you were going to offer t-shirts
and mugs and stuff - but I don't see a link,"
so, not knowing what else to do, I made the store sign blink.
Others have said, "How can we contribute
if we don't have an address?"
So I made the support sign blink, too.
Remember, I'm a low-I.Q. chimp.
Making them blink is going high-tech for me.
You want to sign a petition
that very, very, very politely
tells CNN to shove their
anti-Clinton horseshit?
http://www.projectcnn.com/petition.htm
From: sniper@cei.net
Subject: Paul Harvey
I don't know if you heard Harvey's " The rest
of the story" today but I almost gagged.
Among other things, he lauded Bush for his great
skill has a pilot for the Guard and the
close takeoff formations he and 'Joe" used..
Of course the wing man was none other than
an unrelated Joe Cheney although Paul made it
sound like they had been best buds for 30 years.
Harvey dished out almost as much BS as his bud - Rush.
Scott,
I heard that dallop of horseshit.
He was gushing praase like one of Smirk's oil gushers.
Oh, wait a minute, Smirk never had an oil well come in - nevermind.
Yeah, he was going on and on and on about Smirk being the best pilot
in aviation history,
and his buddy Joe were "such a great team." It was fucking nauseating.
What the horse molester failed to mention was that Smirk was training
on an obsolete plane
so it would have NO CHANCE to go to Vietnam (no parts, no trained mechanics
etc)
he also failed to mentuion that Daddy's influence got him in a "full"
unit,
and, of course, there was no mention of Smirk's 2 years being AWOL
in wartime.
Paul Harvey is a dishonest son of a bitch.
From: Naesg1@cs.com
Subject: thanks for the fumble, dude
First let me say I'm a daily fan of your site
.
But isnt the addition of the "Thanks
for the fumble, dude" equal to christianity?
It seems you are reaching out to an illogical
belief.
I hope i'm not coming across like the asshole
that tried to convert you in your time of grief,
but it seems you are gravitating to that which
you eschew.
Having read the tribute to your friend and realizing
the loss of somone that was near to you,
I get the feeling that you may have inserted
this as a humorous way to remember him, if not it seems hypocritical.
I wrote this for no other reason than curiousity.By
the way I get more kicks out of your site than any other,
my only complaint would be the debates but i
know that you are working on that. I will contribute as soon
as i deal with a few more pressing issues, and
will sign up for PayPal now!
Thanks
Ben
Ben, no, I don't think you're being rude.
Many have written about that, so I might as well talk about it.
It's a joke.
It's a joke Dennis would've thought was really funny, I think.
It was during the Johnson administration when I decided that logic proved
when one dies
the brain shuts off and there is no magical ascension to the place
with clouds and angels.
If you think about it, the idea is too absurd to even consider, but
that's the problem:
Nobody thinks about it because it was drilled into their heads before
they could even speak.
If they didn't brand that crazy fairy tale into young minds, if they
waited until a man was 21
and THEN tried to sell him the craziest story ever told, he'd laugh
and walk away from you.
I wanted to write about that when Payne Stewart went down.
Everybody said he was "playing golf with God," which is so incredibly
insulting to
the intelligence of any thinking human being.
I thought about writing about it when JFK went down, but that wasn't
the right time, either.
Obviously, the personal attack by Phillip Hamer (?) was a stupid move
on his part,
but if he had had any brains, he would've waited and asked about it
later, like you did.
Science and logic are NOT our enemies.
They are our friends.
Religious insanity is the enemy.
Back to the point:
Calling a fumble in the fourth quarter to seal the game for a particular
team days before the game
isn't exactly brain surgery, but since it happened, it gave the joke
a big boost.
But I really did watch that game with my shot of Chinaco Anejo, waiting.
Florida State University
quarterback Chris Weinke fumbles the football as he is tackled by
Oklahoma's Rocky Calmus
during the fourth quarter, January 3, 2001 in the Fed Ex Orange Bowl.
The fumble set up the
only Sooners touchdown, with OU beating FSU 13-2 for the championship.
...so I raised that shot of Chinaco for my old friend,
Sabutai,
but no, his spirit didn't make that fumble happen.
Sooner magic caused that fumble.
George W. Bush, Clinton defender
The new president tells members of the press that stories about vandalism
aboard Air Force One as Clinton left office weren't true.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Jake Tapper at Salon.com
Feb. 14, 2001 | Whore City-- Shortly after noon
on Tuesday, President Bush joined reporters in
the back of Air Force One to rap a little. And
an odd dynamic emerged as reporters tried to get Bush
to engage in a little good ol' fashioned Clinton-bashing.
The 43rd president not only refrained from
taking the bait, but he even defended the president
against some shoddy journalism.
"Are you distracted at all by the furor over the Marc Rich pardon and the former president?" Bush was asked.
"Not at all," he said.
"Not a distraction?"
"Not at all," Bush repeated. "I will tell you
one thing, just in terms of the former president.
All the allegations that they took stuff off
of Air Force One is simply not true, for example."
Bush raised the issue because the chief steward
had told him that the stories alleging that Air Force One
had been pilfered by those rascally white-trash
Clintons were simply not true.
Andrea Mitchell, NBC, Jan. 25: "The Air Force
will replace Air Force One glasses and four hand towels,
apparently pilfered by passengers traveling
with the Clintons on their last plane ride home."
Brit Hume, Fox News Channel, Jan. 25, "The
raid that was conducted aboard that Air Force plane,
on the last flight to New York when the blankets,
pillowcases, silverware ..."
Kate O'Beirne, CNN, Jan. 27, "During Bill Clinton's
final flight, the plane was stripped bare and not by
sentimental staffers seeking mementos. Air
Force One souvenirs were quickly posted for auction online.
Why not make a final buck off the White House?
Outrageous, but not surprising."
But the Air Force One story, as with the allegations
of widespread White House vandalism, proved not to be true.
And Bush was there to say so. "There might have
been a prank or two, maybe somebody put a cartoon on the wall,
but that's OK," Bush said about the White House
"vandalism" on Jan. 26. "It's time now to move forward."
But if Bush says these stories aren't true, where did they come from?
Senior-level Bush White House staffers were indeed
talking reporters out of covering some of the more insane
allegations made about White House vandalism,
trying to convince journalists that some of the charges were false.
But Bush's press secretary, Ari Fleischer, gave
the story credibility a day earlier when he told reporters,
"What we are doing is cataloging that which took
place. And that's the status."
Watch carefully as Fleischer does this "Change the Tone" dance.
"I choose not to describe what acts were done
that we found upon arrival, because I think that's part of changing
the tone in Washington," Fleischer said. "I think
it would be easy for us to reflect and to discuss these things,
and to be critical. President Bush chooses to
set a different tone ... The president understands that transitions
can be times of difficulty and strong emotion.
And he's going to approach it in that vein."
Where was all the damage done? Fleischer was asked.
"You know, I really stopped paying attention to all the different places," he said.
Asked if the phone line that was reportedly cut
could have been damaged in the process of renovation, Fleischer said,
"Well, I don't think that the people who were
professionals who make their business to go in and prepare a
White House for new arrivals would cut wires."
It was only after Jan. 25, after the story of
the White House vandalism erupted, that Fleischer clarified that the team
effort at "cataloging that which took place"
was actually just "one person in our administrative offices who is really
just keeping track in his head about things that
may have taken place."
Kind of a different thing, no?
It's nice that President Bush is classy and responsible
enough to tell the press that the story that so many of them
reported as fact simply wasn't so. But while
former President Clinton awaits Brit Hume's on-air recantation and
apology, his successor might want to devote a
little time to figuring out how and why that falsehood was reported
in the first place. Because sooner or later,
stories that are dogs bite every politician.
We got a nice mention over at http://www.iuptown.com/WatchDubya/BillsBestLinks.htm
They have a ton o' links to anti-Smirk sites.
From: garic2k@yahoo.com
Subject: Shouldn't media apologize to Bill Clinton???
Im sickened that the media is allowed to LIE about Bill Clinton stealing stuff from Air Force 1.
They LIED and SLANDERED Bill Clinton. Yet I've
yet to hear a single apology.
They DEMANDED Clinton apologize again and again
and
again, over his PERSONAL life.
Yet these simpletons can just make up BS about
Clinton and then pretend it never happened...
I DEMAND an APOLOGY.
I'm emailing every Media outlet I can find...
Craig
Craig, they are whores.
Whores don't apologize.
They just slither off and whore some more.
A Washington Whore Post editorial argues that
"The more that is learned about
some of the pardons former President Clinton
granted on his final day in
office -- particularly the pardon of fugitive
financier Marc Rich -- the
more it appears that they constituted a major
abuse of the pardon power."
Yes, we need a major investigation, with Clinton testifying on a Saturday
so everyone can learn what happened and why.
From: it.pins@gtnet.gov.uk
Subject: Site Category _ Websense
I clicked a link to your web site and was denied
access by Websense.
I checked the Websense database on their site
and you are classified as adult entertainment.
I could not contact you from my desk top so I
have to come to this stand alone
(he's in England)
that has no content checking on sites visited.
You may like to take it up with them.
Chris Hart
Chris,
Many of the big American employers have me blocked,
but you can get to Rush Limbaugh's hatred and filth with no problem.
Apparently, I'm a subversive comedian.
Boy, you'd almost think Mr. Conason has been reading bartcop.com
Media’s Clinton Obsession Is
Giving Bush a Free Pass
by Joe Conason
That era of bipartisan good feeling promised by
George W. Bush didn’t last long, did it?
Three weeks after their leader took up residence
in the White House, Mr. Bush’s friends,
appointees and media claque are in hot, barking
pursuit of the prior occupants.
With the President’s mild demurral, Republican
politicians and Washington talking heads have
displayed little interest in any topic besides
their obsession with bringing down the Clintons.
Phony charges about illicit gifts and office
vandalism proliferated, along with valid complaints
about inappropriate pardons and excessive rental
costs. In the reporting of these latest “scandals,”
few distinctions were made between facts and
fantasies, or between the serious and the trivial.
Over the past week the clamor grew louder still,
with two Congressional committees mounting
new probes of Bill Clinton and the new Attorney
General announcing that he would welcome a
probe of the Marc Rich pardon. The Sunday New
York Post fronted a fabricated story by
Dick Morris claiming that Hillary Clinton had
illegally concealed gifts of jewelry and clothing.
They were all topped, however, by Senator Arlen
Specter, who hinted bizarrely in a televised
interview that the former President could be
impeached again, and thus deprived of his pension
and Secret Service protection. This is the sort
of brilliant idea that has made the Pennsylvania
Republican such an ornament of statecraft.
Let’s catch our breath for a few moments and consider the historical context of this post-inaugural eruption.
The last time anyone accused a President of abusing
the pardon power was when the senior George Bush
awarded amnesty to six key defendants in the
Iran-contra affair. Certain conservative pundits, like Robert Novak,
praised this butt-covering proclamation as the
greatest moment of the elder Mr. Bush’s career, but others
admitted that it was merely a scheme to avoid
embarrassing testimony about his own role in the scandal.
The departing President Bush had to endure nothing
worse than a few weeks of scathing editorial commentary.
His offense was quickly forgotten, along with
his own lies and concealment of crucial evidence from the special
prosecutor. And by contrast with the current
controversy, there was no hint of a Congressional investigation;
incoming President Clinton heeded the urgings
of Washington’s establishment and let the unpleasantness fade away.
Or at least he hoped to do so, presumably under
the illusion that he might enjoy some respite from partisan
warfare. Instead Mr. Clinton had the briefest
honeymoon of any President in recent history, with the Republicans
immediately declaring his election illegitimate
and commencing their eternal jihad against him and his wife.
Still, Mr. Clinton never sought an investigation
of the Bush pardons, particularly the mercy extended to former
Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger. The circumstances
were at least as troubling as the deplorable Rich case,
but the Democrats let it pass. Had anyone cared
then about pardons that seemed suspiciously related to campaign
contributions, they might also have scrutinized
President Bush’s 1989 pardon of the late Armand Hammer.
That case excited no great indignation, although
Hammer had given more than $100,000 to the Republican Party
in 1988, and then, just months before he was
pardoned, the crooked industrialist had guaranteed another loan
of $100,000 to the first Bush inauguration.
Speaking of dubious inaugural sponsors, there
are fresher indications of influence-buying that deserve journalistic
attention—that is, if the national media ever
become bored with the Clintons. Alert citizens have probably heard
that the entire state of California is being
gouged by energy companies unleashed to do their worst. Among those
profiting big time from the Golden State’s distress
is a firm called Enron, whose chief executive, Kenneth Lay,
gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to the
Bush-Cheney campaign and to the recent inaugural. Naturally,
Mr. Lay has been advising his friend George W.
on how to cope with the California crisis, which has meant
doing nothing to stop the banditry encouraged
by deregulation.
Amazingly, Mr. Bush’s fund-raisers managed to
solicit nearly $40 million for their January celebrations in just a
month of pleading telephone calls. Most of the
loot came from corporate leaders who desire favors from the
White House. The pharmaceutical industry,
for instance, gave generously and saw its main lobbyist
appointed to head the Office of Management
and Budget. Yet the corporate domination of the
Bush White House is deemed far less worthy
of investigation and comment by the Washington
press corps than whether the Clintons took
the wrong sofa with them to Chappaqua.
For all his rhetoric about it being “time to move
on,” Mr. Bush must be well pleased by the angry uproar
over the Clintons’ departure. And why not? So
long as the country is preoccupied with the former
President’s mistakes, both real and imagined,
nobody is likely to notice what mischief his successor is up to.
From: vhutson@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu
Subject: Nader Bashing
... wholly irrelevant. The Nader vote had absolutely _no_ influence on the outcome of the election.
Assume that everyone that voted for Nader would
have voted for Gore if Nader hadn't run.
What would have changed?
The amount of ballot tampering and absentee ballot
fraud the GOP machine would have had to
perform in order to occupy the white house.
The outcome would have been the same.
It's not like Florida is the only place where
fraud occurred. Have you seen this site?
http://www.nashvilleinsanity.com/NPbreakingnews.html
I have no idea whether it's even possible to get
our democratic rights back. At this point, I'm not
even sure that there will be an election in 2002.
But if you want to make it happen, then you
ought not to be alienating people who would otherwise
be your natural allies in the cause.
IMHO, of course.
Velvet Hutson
Velvet, Gore won the popular vote, Nader only got 3 percent, but it
sounds like
you're saying the Gore people need to wake up and vote for YOUR guy.
Show me the logic in the 49 bowing to the three.
The "natural allies" of the Democrats put Smirk in the White House.
If I was tortured by the knowledge that my vote helped install this
crooked, brainless moron,
I'd be searching for justification, too.
Are you going to make the same mistake in the next election?
Years ago, we got into Rush's 35 "undeniable truths."
Now, Don Cole
has taken a crack at them
Joe Conason is a busy man.
How the Middle East impasse
and the Jonathan Pollard case
influenced Clinton's decision
to pardon Marc Rich.
Comment - I think Mr. Conason has been unduly harsh towards Clinton
on this Rich pardon.
At the very least, he should have acknowledged that it was impossible
for him, Joe,
to have as much information on the pardon as Clinton.
Now he seems to be pulling back, giving Clinton more credit, if
I read this column correctly.
This may prove that even an intelligent man like Joe Conason
can forget that the lying whore press
is fabricating horseshit
to try to ruin our best president ever.
Sidebar:
When all that crap hit the news about trashing
Air Force One and the White House,
I knew immediately that it wasn't
true and said so. Here, in dusty old Oklahoma
with no Washington contacts, Ol' BartCop
saw thru the whore press screen of lies.
Remember this lesson next time they fabricate
a story to protect Smirk.
You cannot trust the press.
From: Jangellamf@aol.com
Subject: Chris Rock/Larry King---hilarious!
(By Hank Essay)
While talking to Chris Rock last night about Bill's
move to Harlem, Larry
King actually asked him about the Rich pardons
and the "gifts." This was
truly one of the most remarkable media exchanges
I have ever seen. Someone
should print a copy of it and ship it to the
Smithsonian so when historians
look back at this terrible time in America, they
will have good evidence of
the media's role in destroying this once great
country..
KING: (If Clinton moves to Harlem) prices will go up.
ROCK: Prices will go up. Who's better than that? You can't stop Clinton.
KING: But aren't you -- are you offended at this.
ROCK: I'm not offended.
KING: How about the Marc Rich pardon?
ROCK: I don't care.
KING: The guy's on the FBI list.
ROCK: He's the president. He could pardon Manson if he wants to.
KING: Yes. But wouldn't you be offended?
ROCK: I'm not offended.
KING: You don't care who he pardons.
ROCK: I don't care.
KING: Shocked at this.
ROCK: Did Marc Rich shoot anybody?
KING: No.
ROCK: Did he punch anybody in the face?
KING: No.
ROCK: OK.
KING: You forgive him anything.
ROCK: I'm fine, hey, whatever.
KING: How about the gifts in the White House, taking all those gifts?
ROCK: Well, it's his stuff.
KING: No, but it's supposed to be -- it's supposed to be your stuff. It belongs to...
ROCK: I don't want that stuff. I don't want the couch. What am
I going to do
with a presidential couch? Let the man take the stuff.
He got a new office. You know what's -- you know what's up with that office,
no furniture.
KING: That's right. You need the furniture.
ROCK: So now he takes some furniture out of the White House,
put it in his new office. What's wrong with that?
KING: How about Hillary?
ROCK: Hillary is fine.
KING: You don't complain about anything.
ROCK: Hillary's a good woman. Stand by your man.
KING: Really stand by your man.
ROCK: Stand by your man.
KING: Were you offended by Lewinsky?
ROCK: Hey, Lewinsky. He's the leader of the free world. He needed to relieve some stress.
KING: You have found a way for everything. Is there anything you don't like?
ROCK: Money, sex, power, they are connected. You don't want power just to sleep with one woman.
KING: You've got a point, Chris. OK...
ROCK: I rule the world so I can sleep with you? No.
I rule the world so I can sleep with you, you, you, you, and you.
Civilians at Helm of Killer Sub
HONOLULU (AP) - Two civilian guests were
at the controls of the USS Greeneville it surfaced
and sank a Japanese fishing vessel off
the Hawaiian coast, a Navy spokesman said Tuesday.
"There were two civilians at two separate
watch stations under the very close supervision of
a qualified watch stander,'' said Lt. Cmdr.
Conrad Chun, a Pacific Fleet spokesman.
He declined to identify which stations were
involved, but said they could
include the helm, sonar or the ballast
control. The Navy has refused to identify
who was aboard, but Chun said the 16 civilians
included business leaders.
From: SGMJAG83@aol.com
Subject: Discover Financial Services/Morgan Stanley Dean Withered
What a coincidence - after reading today about
your abject caving in to
your right-wing masters who spanked you for daring
to sponsor Big Dog to
speak, upon picking up my mail I found a letter
from you offering me a
"pre-approved, platinum, 1.9APR, 2percent cashback
bonus, blah blah, blah" card.
Besides being repulsed by the tasteless manner
in which you grovel, I am
one of the many voters and investors who hold
the XPOTUS in high regard, and
I would sooner allow Dick Morris to suck my toes
than be associated with a
wimpy organization such as yours.
So as not to waste your postage-paid envelope,
I allowed Bubba the Rottweiler to send you a
touch of his sentiments.
Also, consider this as notice not to send me further offers.
Mike Yznaga, Blue County, Texas.
ha ha
Good one, Mike.
Update: Eminem, John confirmed for Grammys
(Launch) - Eminem will perform at the Grammy Awards
on Feb. 21 with Elton John.
The rapper will perform his hit "Stan," with
John singing the chorus. Having Elton John,
who is openly gay, join Eminem for this performance
may lessen some of the heat Eminem
has taken from gay and lesbian groups appalled
by his music. GLAAD has scheduled a protest rally
that will take place outside of the Grammy Awards
ceremony at the Staples Center in Los Angeles.
Hey, I have no love for Eminem, and I don't even know what his anti-gay
lyrics are (don't send)
but after reforming Axl Rose, if Elton can reform Eminem, ...can't
we just all get along?
It seems to make no sense for gays to protest the guy singing with Elton
John.
If Elton is OK with the deal, does that mean gays are upset he sold
out?
I kinda like the whole idea, the Axl/Elton/Eminem thing.
Course I'm straight, so my opinion is lacking,
but if it's OK with Elton...
Sidebar: Open to discussion.
Is the Grammy's just one big whorefest now?
If they're giving Grammys to Britney Spears and
N Sync, they are.
They should let Britney and N Sync perform, to
draw a crowd, maybe,
but don't go bestowing Grammys to talentless,
good-looking "musicians."
Justice Uncle Thomas' Coming
Out Party
by Maureen Dowd - she hates everybody
Did the Fed help fix the election?
David W. Fennell writes -- Full story from Online Journal
"I now strongly question the truthfulness of the Fed chairman Mr. Greenspan.
His recent turn about in endorsing Mr. Bush's tax plan leaves me with
some serious questions.
I am starting to believe that the whole Fed-tightening basis that we
just went through was not
so much for fighting the non existent inflationary dragons, but more
for the squeezing of the
economy right before an election.
The 50-point basis rate increase of March 2,000 now appears to have
had no reason for being.
November rolled around however, and companies were issuing earnings
warnings across the board.
Oil prices were at an all time high, and the NASDAQ was off by more
than 50 percent from it's
previous high. Across the board, Americans were given reasons for concern,
just look at
December's auto sales, they fell by an all time rate of more than 12
percent. Consumer confidence
was quickly hitting an all time low. By the time the election
had taken place the Boogieman had
rolled back into the economic picture 'big time,' as we went from 6
percent growth to zero in
a matter of a few months.
Was this purely accidental?
We more than witnessed how the Supreme Court could wield its power
when necessary,
why should we think that the Fed would do anything different?"
Bush atheist quote sourced
Excerpt:
RS: Surely you recognize the equal citizenship
and patriotism of Americans who are atheists?
GHHB: No, I don't know that atheists
should be considered as citizens,
nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.
Thanks to Scott French.
From: enatoni@yahoo.com
Subject: your site
you do nothing but bitch about shit that doesnt
concern everyday joes.
who gives a shit if some fat ass has his own
radio program and he so happens to
speak more truth in one program than bill "define
is" clinton ever did in his whole life?
and who gives a flying fuck if clinton is the
best foreign policy president in a while.
fix our country first then AND ONLY THEN do you
fix the other shit happening in the world.
your site sucks.
stupid ass.
sincerely,
toni
ha ha
Usually at this point I offer to debate the challenger,
but something tells me Toni has a never-ending period
Read the Previous
Issue
It had everything - Miller-pounding, a burning
bush, a wave, an oops and a strong defense.
Copyright © 2001, bartcop.com
Thanks for the fumble,
Dude.
